Roger Hicks
Veteran
You're right. I must have been mistaken.What? Malcolm McLaren manufacture a scandal to promote record sales? i won't hear of such a thing, I tell you!
Cheers,
R.
You're right. I must have been mistaken.What? Malcolm McLaren manufacture a scandal to promote record sales? i won't hear of such a thing, I tell you!
Oh, that's nothing. For another example of my depraved tastes, Google Alma-Tadema. Or just go straight to http://www.alma-tadema.org/ Photography is as naught when compared with some of the things that painters of "classical" subjects got up to in the 19th century. I quite like Poynter too -- go to http://www.artmagick.com/pictures/picture.aspx?id=5842&name=the-cave-of-the-storm-nymphs for "I don't know much about art but I know what I like" or to http://www.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=...k4Usm9MOXW4ATWs4CQBg&ved=0CDMQ9QEwAg&dur=3584 for the first Poynter I ever encountered -- but I really do have doubts about Boulanger's Slave Market, http://biblioklept.org/2011/02/08/the-slave-market-gustave-boulanger/I shall never read one of your articles again, liking such a disgusting image tsk tsk tsk 🙂. Seriously the picture is not bad and I don't really see the scandal. But let's not forget Sutcliffe and his shameful depiction of bathing boys that got him excommunicated. Photography is full of perverts one should really start to forbid this artform so much perversion eek 🙂
Oh, that's nothing. For another example of my depraved tastes, Google Alma-Tadema. Or just go straight to http://www.alma-tadema.org/ Photography is as naught when compared with some of the things that painters of "classical" subjects got up to in the 19th century. I quite like Poynter too -- go to http://www.artmagick.com/pictures/picture.aspx?id=5842&name=the-cave-of-the-storm-nymphs for "I don't know much about art but I know what I like" or to http://www.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=...k4Usm9MOXW4ATWs4CQBg&ved=0CDMQ9QEwAg&dur=3584 for the first Poynter I ever encountered -- but I really do have doubts about Boulanger's Slave Market, http://biblioklept.org/2011/02/08/the-slave-market-gustave-boulanger/
Cheers,
R.
Was it minors or homosexuality? I'd guess that in Italy/Sicily at that time the age of heterosexual consent was 12, and hardly rigorously enforced. I didn't know about von G. and body make up though: I suppose it makes sense for mosquito bites and the like. Thanks. My recollection is that some of that crowd were either AC/DC or (female-fancying) paedophiles -- the other one, I've just checked, was Galdi -- but that is based principally on Taschen's 1000 Nudes (which is where I checked).Wilhelm von Gloeden and his teenage male nudes as well as Gloedens cousin Wilhelm Plüschow the later was sentenced to 8 months in prison for having sex with minors. The first is still considered one of the pioneers and masters of male nude photography he was also the first to use body make up.
Polanski's no Eric Gill, that's for sure.
One should remember that Ernst Leitz was a dedicated anti-Nazi and did more than his part in the rescue of persecuted Jews. See this link:
http://www.kazantoday.com/WeeklyArticles/ernst-leitz.html
... it's his dog I feel sorry for
Maybe their computers are at their bedsides? We are dealing with serious loonies here. On the other hand, 0.01% of 300 million people is still 30,000 people and probably most who are that crazy are on the internet. What else would they do all day?Wow, there are some nutjobs around, aren't there? I'm amazed they have enough brainpower to get out of bed in the morning, let alone operate a computer.
Eminently true, but equally, joining the Nazi party was not necessarily evidence of accepting Nazi ideology. It might equally have been the most basic survival strategy.He was also a member of the Nazi party BTW. Few in Nazi Germany were completely un-compromised, and the hagiography about the Leitz family is somewhat over the top.
Maybe their computers are at their bedsides? We are dealing with serious loonies here. On the other hand, 0.01% of 300 million people is still 30,000 people and probably most who are that crazy are on the internet. What else would they do all day?
Cheers,
R.
Eminently true, but equally, joining the Nazi party was not necessarily evidence of accepting Nazi ideology. It might equally have been the most basic survival strategy.
Of course we all like to think we would rather starve/die than join the Nazi party but fortunately most of us have never been faced with the actual choice.
Cheers,
R.
Eminently true, but equally, joining the Nazi party was not necessarily evidence of accepting Nazi ideology. It might equally have been the most basic survival strategy.
Which was, in fact, the point.Lots of Germans got through that period without joining the party. Maybe your man Leitz saw membership as conveying commercial advantage rather than simply a survival strategy.
Who really knows? I'm sure I don't.