Netsoft2k
Well-known
Thank you so much for this! I greatly appreciate it.R39 resistor on my SM4000
https://www.flickr.com/photos/25191222@N04/27942184440/in/dateposted-public/
I think this is all I need. I'll update everyone soon.
Regards,
Pali
Thank you so much for this! I greatly appreciate it.R39 resistor on my SM4000
https://www.flickr.com/photos/25191222@N04/27942184440/in/dateposted-public/
R39 resistor on my SM4000
https://www.flickr.com/photos/25191222@N04/27942184440/in/dateposted-public/
So, installing this on the 5K is a bit more work than I am willing to mess with for the time being. I believe I will have to remove the entire frame to access the screws that are mounting the fiber optic to the lamp frame. As a "cheat", I tried to glue the filter on top of the entry point on the frame and essentially double on the filters that were ahead of the fiber optic end and though this reduced the red, it caused the scanner to fail white point calibration. For now, I have removed the filter from the 5K but will attempt it again if I feel ambitious at some point.
For 11K users, this is a 10 minute job and does make a big difference to consider it.
Pali
...
Scanners should do LOG conversion electricaly before ADC.
Please try perform a simple test. Make scan negative in the CQ as you do it so far. Then do the scan without IT8 and save the RAW 8bit. Then load the RAW file 8bit to PS and convert to 16bit and start ColorPerfect. At the magnification of 100% Compare two scans, you'll see that the scan converted Raw 8bit to 16bit is sharper and the colors are much better.
In fact, the same thing can be done in CT scanning negatives as slides, but a certain advantage over CQ is that it can change the value of Gamma, which has a large impact when converting negatives. Quality scans with CT is exactly the same as with CQ in Raw mode 8bit and can not in any other way, achieve better quality scans. Every other way save files in the CQ will only worsening the quality of scans. The only downside in the CT Scan or CQ Raw 8 bit can be visibility effect "wow & flutter", which is masked by a blur when writing files to TIFF, resulting in a fuzzy, ugly scans.
This is interesting because normally one would use warm white Cree XML2 diode - higher flux and CRI (85)?
RGBW diodes connected in series to one driver right? Voltage?
Driven above 350mA per diode?
Armando and Jack, what is the benefit of higher powered light sources?