northeast16th
Member
Here is a non-scientific scan test. Feedback very welcome. Have you had similar results?
Profiled iMac monitor. Epson 2450. Silverfast SE. Ilford HP5 6x6. Negative is very well exposed with a good tonal range.
1.....Scanned as transparency in grayscale and inverted. Best overall image quality. Much easier to work with than the others. Least amount of tinkering to get a great image in P-shop.
2.....Scanned as transparency in 48 bit color and inverted. 2nd best, but no improvement in image quality or tonal range with color setting, and extra steps needed to balance it out after scanning.
3.....Scanned as negative in grayscale. Way too contrasty. Very hard to work with. Would take much pre-scanning tweaking to get it acceptable. Is it worth it to spend time on pre-scan tweaking of settings to scan it in this mode?
4.....Scanned as negative in 48 bit color. Probably almost tied for 2nd to tell the truth, but histogram on transparency in grayscale was almost perfect as is, whereas this way the tonal range was a bit more narrow and had to be stretched out a bit.
These are all just straight scans with the above mentioned differences in settings. I am very new to scanning, but it's going to fit well into my workflow. I prefer shooting film, and then after I get it into digital format I send it to a professional printer.
Thanks for any feedback or comparisons or advice. Hope this helps if you haven't run this test and were curious.
scott
Profiled iMac monitor. Epson 2450. Silverfast SE. Ilford HP5 6x6. Negative is very well exposed with a good tonal range.
1.....Scanned as transparency in grayscale and inverted. Best overall image quality. Much easier to work with than the others. Least amount of tinkering to get a great image in P-shop.
2.....Scanned as transparency in 48 bit color and inverted. 2nd best, but no improvement in image quality or tonal range with color setting, and extra steps needed to balance it out after scanning.
3.....Scanned as negative in grayscale. Way too contrasty. Very hard to work with. Would take much pre-scanning tweaking to get it acceptable. Is it worth it to spend time on pre-scan tweaking of settings to scan it in this mode?
4.....Scanned as negative in 48 bit color. Probably almost tied for 2nd to tell the truth, but histogram on transparency in grayscale was almost perfect as is, whereas this way the tonal range was a bit more narrow and had to be stretched out a bit.
These are all just straight scans with the above mentioned differences in settings. I am very new to scanning, but it's going to fit well into my workflow. I prefer shooting film, and then after I get it into digital format I send it to a professional printer.
Thanks for any feedback or comparisons or advice. Hope this helps if you haven't run this test and were curious.
scott