Scanning with a digital camera

That portrait is inspiring. Really worth clicking on it to see it bigger.

Camera scanning rocks! And Vince's pics aren't too shabby either!
😉
 
Huss said:
That portrait is inspiring. Really worth clicking on it to see it bigger.

Camera scanning rocks! And Vince's pics aren't too shabby either!
😉
Click to expand...

Many thanks Huss - yeah back in the 90's I guess I was okay. Not sure where I went wrong - maybe I need to go back to an M2 and HP5?


Laurie by Vince Lupo, on Flickr


Laurie2 by Vince Lupo, on Flickr
 
Huss said:
Just beautiful Vince!
Glad to have you onboard this thread!
Click to expand...

Many thanks -- that was a total luck shot, though I think it could be better. I think I did that back in about 1998 as well (1998 seems to have been a productive year for me!) for a regional magazine out here. It was a new car test that was also incorporating a travel piece, which was on the covered bridges of Lancaster County, PA. I was just inside the bridge taking some photos through one of those cutouts on the right, when these Amish kids came walking through. As soon as they saw me, the little ones took off running. I think I may have gotten about 3 or 4 shots, this was the best one. This is the only slide of that series I've held onto.
 
M2 and Tri-X, 1993. One of my very few wedding photos.


Wedding by Vince Lupo, on Flickr


Also from 1993, M2 and Tri-X. Not as crazy about this scan -- seems that some detail is lost (I notice it in the hands).


Eiffel Tower by Vince Lupo, on Flickr


Untitled 1993 #4 by Vince Lupo, on Flickr


Carrousel de la Tour Eiffel by Vince Lupo, on Flickr


Untitled 1993-3 by Vince Lupo, on Flickr

You know this is very odd -- I haven't really gone through these France pictures in-depth like this since 1993. Hmm, maybe I have an exhibition here that's been sitting around all this time!
 
Huss said:
Do it! The carousel picture tells such a story.
Click to expand...

I think if I did do a show, I might have to see about getting better scans than what the Z7 can deliver. I made an 11”x16” test print of the carrousel photo today (just before I ran out of both paper and light black ink) and it looked too grainy for my liking. Not sure if there’s a fix for that, other than seeing about getting a higher quality scan (and no, I’m not going back into the darkroom thanks). I’m confident that I’d have more than enough material from this 1993 France stuff for a show, but I’d want to make sure that it’s going to look good when printed.
 
Vince Lupo said:
I think if I did do a show, I might have to see about getting better scans than what the Z7 can deliver. I made an 11”x16” test print of the carrousel photo today (just before I ran out of both paper and light black ink) and it looked too grainy for my liking. Not sure if there’s a fix for that, other than seeing about getting a higher quality scan...
Click to expand...

The image seems over-sharpened. Would a less sharpened version have more pleasing grain?
 
Andprayforrain said:
The image seems over-sharpened. Would a less sharpened version have more pleasing grain?
Click to expand...

I don't know, actually. I don't think I went sharpening-crazy on it, but of course anything is possible. What I am going to do tomorrow is have one of our local photo labs do a high-grade scan of it so that I compare. I've been wanting to get a high-quality scan of this image anyways, so it's a good opportunity to do a side-by-side comparison. I can always try again with the Z7 -- interestingly, I did a scan with my Plustek 8200i and it looked almost the same.

I also have a silver print of this image (though it's only 6"x9") and it has some grain to be sure (it's Tri-X), but it's nowhere near as pronounced as it is in the Z7 scan.
 
Vince Lupo said:
What I am going to do tomorrow is have one of our local photo labs do a high-grade scan of it so that I compare. I've been wanting to get a high-quality scan of this image anyways, so it's a good opportunity to do a side-by-side comparison. I can always try again with the Z7...

I also have a silver print of this image (though it's only 6"x9") and it has some grain to be sure (it's Tri-X), but it's nowhere near as pronounced as it is in the Z7 scan.
Click to expand...

A closeup comparison of the lab scan, the Z7 scan and your darkroom version would be greatly appreciated.
 
Does anyone know if it's possible to stop NLP from writing 'Digitized with Negative Lab Pro v2.1.2' in the caption field of images? It's more than a little annoying when you're ploughing through hundreds of scans! Thanks.
 
Montag said:
Does anyone know if it's possible to stop NLP from writing 'Digitized with Negative Lab Pro v2.1.2' in the caption field of images? It's more than a little annoying when you're ploughing through hundreds of scans! Thanks.
Click to expand...

You probably know you can select all and sync (after changing master), still an extra step. Contact NLP developer and ask him to change in next update?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rayt
Camera scanning with Leica M10M
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Godfrey
Godfrey
A
My Leica SL2-S settings
Replies
0
Views
639
Archiver
A
J
  • Featured
  • Article Article
What exactly is a point & shoot camera? Glad you asked!The Kodak of 1888 may have been the first, and even Leica got into the act!
Replies
16
Views
570
Jason Schneider
J
R
Leica Digital M (11-D) Bugs
Replies
6
Views
659
Photon42
Photon42
G
Using a Nikon Super CoolScan 4000 ED versus a digital camera w/VALOI easy35 (or other similar alternatives).
Replies
7
Views
1K
Godfrey
Godfrey
Back
Top Bottom