Sonnar2 said:
True. In fact I would have bought a black post-war Leica instead of my black II of 1935 if I could get ahold of one!
But here in Germany no "serious" Leica-owner would think about a paint job for the holy legend. It could lose some € in worth, because it has lost it's originality! 🙂
No I agree on the originality ideals,
BUT and here comes the
BUT, since I can`t find a Leitz Eigenturm black 1946' IIIC and I`m not a
SERIOUS collector , so
I`d want a "beater" camera anyway for a repaint
🙂
I think a late 45'/46' "Half Race" or a mid 46' post 400000+ camera that`s been converted to IIIF BD is the
PERFECT black paint camera.....while that too isn`t really original anymore either, well it`s just for
ME anyway , for an expensive and classy looking
USER 😛
*and every Luton repaint IIIC/IIIF I`ve even seen sold sells for at least $500+ so there`s not too much investment lost*
Tom
PS: I mean I would`nt restore a IIIC K "Grey" either
*unless* like 70% or more of the paint`s gone/brassed away and the vulcanite`s totally fallen off.....because that`s just plain ugly condition
(a camera like that is out there someplace and I would put some $$$ into it for a restoration, because I would`nt mind having a freshly painted and restored CLA`d Leica IIIC K to work with.....)