cancan7
Established
taken at a disused railway track with a Horizon Perfekt

l.mar
Well-known
didjiman
Richard Man
semilog
curmudgeonly optimist
OK, Richard. You've had your fun. Time to box up the XPAN and send it to me. 
ferider
Veteran
A couple from Alaska (and some reposts from my Alaska thread)
Roland.



Roland.
Monz
Monz
Monz
Monz
Monz
Monz
Monz
Monz
jan normandale
Film is the other way
Roland, that last one of the tundra... outstanding.
ferider
Veteran
Thanks, Jan 
gshybrid
Well-known
so, seeing the xpan images side by side with horizon images ~ how are y'all avoiding the curve that i see on so many pano images?
the perspective seems so much more normal on the xpan posts ~ is that just a result of level horizons, tripod, or is the swing lens on the horizon a factor?
I believe the Horizons are 28mm and Xpans are mostly fitted with a 45mm. Xpans are a remarkable cameras with little distortion although the vignetting is pretty severe with the 30mm. I never even seen a Horizon but I'd say the initial quality of the xpan is much higher.
kuzano
Veteran
A Taste Of Eastern Oregon High Desert
A Taste Of Eastern Oregon High Desert
The eastern Oregon High Desert country is filled with the evidence of hard scrabble farmers attempting to eak a living out of hard country. Endless miles of sage and junipers, changing to mountains and pine forests.
This image was stitched in Elements 6.0 from 3 frames shot with a Canon Rebel XTi (digital).
Frankly, I must complain here and say that this forum does no justice to the image. It is much sharper and focused on my monitor on my desk. What's up with the degraded image shown here?
A Taste Of Eastern Oregon High Desert
The eastern Oregon High Desert country is filled with the evidence of hard scrabble farmers attempting to eak a living out of hard country. Endless miles of sage and junipers, changing to mountains and pine forests.
This image was stitched in Elements 6.0 from 3 frames shot with a Canon Rebel XTi (digital).

Frankly, I must complain here and say that this forum does no justice to the image. It is much sharper and focused on my monitor on my desk. What's up with the degraded image shown here?
Last edited:
didjiman
Richard Man
@kuzano, make sure you convert your profile to sRGB before uploading.
Ron (Netherlands)
Well-known
Civil war cemetery:
![]()
A formal garden (oops, left out a quadrant):
![]()
Stunning pictures! I especially like these old american cemeteries.
didjiman
Richard Man
I think we can make a fine Blurb book with images from this thread alone 
kuzano
Veteran
Another Oregon early homestead (Madras OR)
Another Oregon early homestead (Madras OR)
Four frames from Olympus E400 (last Kodak Sensor Oly DSLR)
Next... to test forum sizing. This image is from Photobucket. I will also upload from my computer direct to RFF image upload.
Another Oregon early homestead (Madras OR)

Four frames from Olympus E400 (last Kodak Sensor Oly DSLR)
Next... to test forum sizing. This image is from Photobucket. I will also upload from my computer direct to RFF image upload.
Last edited:
kuzano
Veteran
Conclusion about Photobucket linking (my last post)
Conclusion about Photobucket linking (my last post)
It appears from my two previous posts that linking to Photobucket produces a poor image on the forum. I did make sure the profile on the most recent post was sRGB.
Furthermore, using the thumbnail linking produced a much clearer image, although smaller.
Lastly, both images linked from Photobucket are much clearer and sharper on my monitor and computer.
Looks like I need to try a couple of host sites other than Photobucket, or stick to simply doing attachments to the posts.
Considering the bandwidth that this thread alone must be using and the deformation of width of each page, I'm almost ready to say image hot-linking should be removed from RFF.
Conclusion about Photobucket linking (my last post)
It appears from my two previous posts that linking to Photobucket produces a poor image on the forum. I did make sure the profile on the most recent post was sRGB.
Furthermore, using the thumbnail linking produced a much clearer image, although smaller.
Lastly, both images linked from Photobucket are much clearer and sharper on my monitor and computer.
Looks like I need to try a couple of host sites other than Photobucket, or stick to simply doing attachments to the posts.
Considering the bandwidth that this thread alone must be using and the deformation of width of each page, I'm almost ready to say image hot-linking should be removed from RFF.
Gunstarhero
Newbie
Here are some recent photos taken at my schools football game. Shot with a Horizon 202 on CVS brand 800 film. Notice how the light streaks to the right on the stadium lights from the swinging lens. I always shoot video of the games and make recap videos for the schools youtube account but I really wanted to play with my new pano camera that night. My department makes the universities magazine and I was thrilled to find out that they will be publishing the first photo here. They said its the best photo they have seen of the stadium. They couldn't believe it when I told them I shot it on film.



Monz
Monz
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.