aizan
Veteran
it's pretty good looking for a pseudo-dslr, but it still isn't what i was hoping for. oh well..
the design clues from the rumor sites suggest a top middle EVF: worst decision ever in my opinion. i hate pressing my nose against displays. it's an EVF damnit, they could put it wherever they can and they choose not to put it on the left corner? I know there are left eyed people but most are right eyed, right? And the left eyed folks do not even have an advantage from a middle finder, or do they (I really don't know)?
The finder is what I love the most about the X100 (and I actually use the parallax "haunted" OVF more than the EVF). And they already have it at the right spot in their Nex6 and 7.
Finally. Next to the digital Leicas the first full frame camera that can take most legacy glass.
Watch Leica lens prices (old and new) climb even higher. Don't sell your Summicron just yet. 🙂
Roland.
How do you know? You can't even put your thoughts in a single post, but you can read the designers minds?AMEN!!!
The EVF is in the middle simply to make the camera look like a DSLR. It's skeumorphic nonsense, and in this case, actually detracts from the function of the camera.
"Taking" legacy glass is one thing. Doing justice to the optical qualities of legacy glass is quite another.
Even Leica can't build a FF camera with a sensor that doesn't produce massive colour shifts with rangefinder glass, without a software fix based on lens coding.
Finally. Next to the digital Leicas the first full frame camera that can take most legacy glass.
Watch Leica lens prices (old and new) climb even higher. Don't sell your Summicron just yet. 🙂
Roland.
How do you know? You can't even put your thoughts in a single post, but you can read the designers minds?
here it is in beautiful form:
![]()
ty wfrank at fm 🙂
btw, the evf is not in middle.
DSLR autofocus will be dramatically better. Sports and birds are still not E-mount friendly.
"Even Leica"?
Leica is at least 20 years behind the Japanese camera companies in the terms of digital technologies (I own M9-P and Nex, use to have X cameras so I do believe that I can compare). Leica only has the name in the lens from the history and rangefinder, nothing else. It is the very same 28 finder for more than 50 years. There are 100s of interesting SLR lens that would work perfectly with the new Sony and that are on par with Leica glass (and for the fraction of the price).
Sorry, but this is just false.
First off, hyperbole doesn't help your argument. What was the state of the art sensor in 1993? Do you really think the Leica M 240 is on par with that?!?
Second, show me an SLR 35mm that outperforms the 35 ASPH FLE. Forget about price; just show me one. Or a 50 that outperforms the APO-Summicron ASPH.
Sorry, but this is just false.
First off, hyperbole doesn't help your argument. What was the state of the art sensor in 1993? Do you really think the Leica M 240 is on par with that?!?
Second, show me an SLR 35mm that outperforms the 35 ASPH FLE. Forget about price; just show me one. Or a 50 that outperforms the APO-Summicron ASPH.
DSLR autofocus will be dramatically better. Sports and birds are still not E-mount friendly.
APO Summicron - you mean the lens that costs 8000 USD and that the Leica is taking back for complete rebuild due to the poor constructions?
The tone on this board has gone markedly downhill in the last 6 months. This is a good example.
Enjoy the camera, and its inappropriately placed EVF.
Don't look now, but your ignorance is showing. Quick, cover up. Maybe no one saw.