Summaron 35mm f2.8

[Exoflux]

I already saw this picture on Flickr, and I love it!

 

[maddoc]

Leica M3, 35/2.8 Summaron (w/ eyes), Tri-X R09

 

[Vincent.G]

M2 and Tri-X

 

[Doug]

M240, ISO 200, f/2.8

 

[Erik van Straten]

Thank you Philipus and Gary.

Leica M3, Summaron 35mm f/2.8 goggles, TriX.

Erik.

 

[maddoc]

Thank you Philipus and Gary. Leica M3, Summaron 35mm f/2.8 goggles, TriX. Erik.

I like this portrait.

Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner

 

[shortstop]

Having started this thread, and then having had to sell the wonderful Summaron, this last week I sold some prints from photographs made with it. Lovely lens. Wish I could have afforded to keep it.

I like this photo

 

[giulio stucchi]

m2, summaron 35 2.8, tri-x, lc29

m2, summaron 35 2.8, tri-x, lc29


056.14 by atelierdelvizio, on Flickr

 

[martinjames]

I've been enjoying my screwmount Summaron 35mm f2.8 lately.
On cheap Fuji 200:

 

[raid]

Has anyone here compared the Summaron with the Nikkor 3.5 2.5? They should be similar in performance. Right?

 

[Erik van Straten]

Has anyone here compared the Summaron with the Nikkor 3.5 2.5? They should be similar in performance. Right?

I have a quite early example. Maybe later ones have better coatings and more contrast. My Summarons are contrastier. They are cleaned from fog. Most Summarons in original condition are fogged. I never saw a fogged Nikkor.

Nikon S2, W.Nikkor.C 35mm f/2.5 No. 249267, Tmax400.

Erik.

 

[Ljós]

Thank you Philipus and Gary.

Leica M3, Summaron 35mm f/2.8 goggles, TriX.

Erik.

Very nice indeed. That is the Summaron look in a nutshell. Great sharpness close up, but not clinical. Very "classical" (hard to describe, but "you know it when you see it" background.

Greetings, Ljós

 

[Erik van Straten]

Thank you, Ljós.

Leica M3, Summaron 35mm f/2.8 goggles, Tmax400.

Erik.

 

[Vics]

Has anyone here compared the Summaron with the Nikkor 3.5 2.5? They should be similar in performance. Right?

I did a side-by-side comparison last year, but found it inconclusive. If I hadn't taken careful notes, I wouldn't have been able to tell them apart. I have the Summaron with goggles and the Nikkor in S-mount which I shoot with an Amadeo adapter and CV VF, so the ergonomic factors decided me in favor of the Summaron.

 

[raid]

Thanks, Vic. The Nikkor costs also much less these days than the Summaron. So it is "better" based on an economic factor


ergonomic versus economic ....

 

[giulio stucchi]

Moi je suis musicien (ildonda surrealista)

Moi je suis musicien (ildonda surrealista)

love my summaron!


Moi je suis musicien (ildonda surrealista) by atelierdelvizio, on Flickr

 

[giulio stucchi]

m2, summaron 35 2.8, neopan 400, lc29

m2, summaron 35 2.8, neopan 400, lc29

005.15 by atelierdelvizio, on Flickr

 

[aadi]

Leica M3 / Summaron 35mm 2.8 (goggled) / TRI-X 400 / DD-X 1+4

Untitled - Montreal, 2015 by Aadi Salman, on Flickr

 

[giulio stucchi]

m2, summaron 35 2.8, plus x 125, dd-x

m2, summaron 35 2.8, plus x 125, dd-x

012.15 by atelierdelvizio, on Flickr

 

[Dektol Dan]

Summaron and Mono

Summaron and Mono

I think I may have posted this before in the Mono thread...