Terry Richardson Bashing

Status
Not open for further replies.
>he made $58 million between June 2012 and June 2013.

oh no, that tells something about industry - it's actually worse than meth cooking.
 
As an aside...I own the Gaga book in question. It looks like he shot concerts/backstage with a D2X and a strobe, and candids with a m4/3 like a Panasonic GF series...there are a couple of selfies in there.

It's a fairly large-format book...the D2X and GF1(?) files hold up nicely...another nail in the coffin for upgrade GAS 🙂
 
Last edited:
If I were you, Chris, I'd delete your post about Bob Shell in order to avoid a potential lawsuit. That's pure libel.

Cheers,

R.

Roger, how is it libel? He was convicted and sent to prison by the state of Virginia for drugging a 19 year old woman, and having sex with her dead body after she died of drug overdose. He was given a long enough prison sentence that he will never live long enough to be released. He has repeatedly appealed his convictions and has lost every one.
 
I love Terry Richardson

I feel like if it wasnt for him most contemporary fashion photography and photography in general would look french.
 
Roger, how is it libel? He was convicted and sent to prison by the state of Virginia for drugging a 19 year old woman, and having sex with her dead body after she died of drug overdose. He was given a long enough prison sentence that he will never live long enough to be released. He has repeatedly appealed his convictions and has lost every one.
He was convicted of involuntary manslaughter, which is not quite the same thing. As for the sentence, he'd have got less time for plain murder. This was a prurient reaction against a fool, by small-town reactionaries. Yes, he was a fool: but over 30 years in prison?

All right, I've known him for 25+ years, and, as I say, he was a fool. and as you say, he was convicted. Even so, with my lawyer's hat on. I'd still recommend withdrawing that statement. Addendum: I may however be overreacting in favour of someone who was a friend for many years.

Cheers,

R.
 
More Bashing ?
Now photographers…. What did we run out of gear to bitch about?

PKR.. I like your posts for the most part. You keep a keen eye on Photographers rights (or the infringement of those rights).

A thread to bash a pro photg no matter what anyone thinks of him is across the line of sensible imo.

He makes his money creating smoke for those that are creating fires.
It's just another way of getting regular folks to come see what's burning.

If the guy is not a legitimate photographer ok he's not. I can't say for sure that I'm qualified to judge. He may just be a sensationalist that holds a camera.
He does what he does and is in demand enough to demand big bucks. There is some service he is rendering to do so.
OK, he does not measure up to Legends of photography while still eclipsing those same legends in earning.
Who can fault the guy for creating a market for himself. His Vulgarity is only outdone by many if not most of his subjects.
There is such a thing as free will. Nobody has to behave like a fool for Terry's Camera.

Live and let live for.
 
No, I was speculating as to the activities of Terry Richardson. He's clearly a sexual predator, likely a pedophile and rapist as well.
 
I'm sure his victims appreciate your view.

Not sure if I consider them victims. Terry hasn't been charged with anything to the best of my knowledge.


I mean if he really did abuse women then no I don't condone that and he deserves whatever is coming to him.

But people lie all the time, especially in the industry.
 
Not sure if I consider them victims. Terry hasn't been charged with anything to the best of my knowledge.


I mean if he really did abuse women then no I don't condone that and he deserves whatever is coming to him.

But people lie all the time, especially in the industry.

Did you read the part about the stylist who watched him 'sexually abuse' two east european women who didn't speak english, then had to quit for a while to deal with the shame she felt for not stopping him?

I can't wait til somebody calls me a prude, or blames the victims. It looks to me like there is a certain population of photographers who are looking to abuse women, using photography as a means to do so, and try to play it off when this gets attention. Big news, I know, but it seems a good thing to point out before we all get too cool huh?
 
Did you read the part about the stylist who watched him 'sexually abuse' two east european women who didn't speak english, then had to quit for a while to deal with the shame she felt for not stopping him?

I can't wait til somebody calls me a prude, or blames the victims. It looks to me like there is a certain population of photographers who are looking to abuse women, using photography as a means of doing so. Big news, I know, but it seems a good thing to point out before we all get too cool huh?


Whats that stylists name? Did the two European women come forward?


I can't wait til somebody calls me a prude, or blames the victims. It looks to me like there is a certain population of photographers who are looking to abuse women, using photography as a means of doing so. Big news, I know, but it seems a good thing to point out before we all get too cool huh?

There are sexual predators in every field.

Why is it only with photography is no real evidence or proof needed?
 
They don't speak english, that's what makes it so easy for Richardson to rape them and get away with it. Makes sense, huh? Good job helping him do so.

Can you hear yourself?

So your saying its possible to rape someone and get away with it just because they dont speak English? Oh and who is that Stylist who was there. Whats her name?
 
More Bashing ?
Now photographers…. What did we run out of gear to bitch about?

PKR.. I like your posts for the most part. You keep a keen eye on Photographers rights (or the infringement of those rights).

A thread to bash a pro photg no matter what anyone thinks of him is across the line of sensible imo.

He makes his money creating smoke for those that are creating fires.
It's just another way of getting regular folks to come see what's burning.

If the guy is not a legitimate photographer ok he's not. I can't say for sure that I'm qualified to judge. He may just be a sensationalist that holds a camera.
He does what he does and is in demand enough to demand big bucks. There is some service he is rendering to do so.
OK, he does not measure up to Legends of photography while still eclipsing those same legends in earning.
Who can fault the guy for creating a market for himself. His Vulgarity is only outdone by many if not most of his subjects.
There is such a thing as free will. Nobody has to behave like a fool for Terry's Camera.

Live and let live for.

Richardson's actions call any of our (pro photographers) actions into question. What he does and the way he does it, gives us all a bad name. I don't like having to defend the actions of another photographer - something I have no control over. He's a weed that needs removal.
 
There are sexual predators in every field.

Why is it only with photography is no real evidence or proof needed?

Because Bob Shell ****ed a dead girl. I think I'm done with you. You ask too many wide eyed questions, like you can't imagine reality existing. You're just covering up for a sexual predator.
 
Sure, Richardson's not a rapist because I'm a white knight. Keep trying. So do Richardson's victims stop existing because you don't see them?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom