x-ray
Veteran
Sorry, that's correct. The nocton is the best of the two.
Thanks
Thanks
kshapero
South Florida Man
BillBingham2 said:Stu,
The 35/1.2 is a full stop and a half faster than a 35/2! If you want fast and not a lot more size, look at the 40/1.4 CV. IMHO, great price for great glass. I was lusting after the 35/1.2 for a while. Great filter size (52mm), sharp, very fast, everything I wanted in a lens. But when the 40/1.4 came out, I jumped on one and never regrated it yet. It's a lot smaller and not too much slower.
B2 (;->
Mega ditto's:bang:
dostacos
Dan
I have it as my next gas attack, when I get it I will let you know, we can meet upkyle said:Thats what I'm really interested in. CQ has a picture of one mounted, but its a pretty funky angle, so its kinda hard to tell.
I don't believe Gandy has a storefront, does he? I wish Freestyle carried Voigltander gear, then I could just go down there and check it out.
![]()
K
Kyle
Guest
dostacos said:I have it as my next gas attack, when I get it I will let you know, we can meet up
I would really appreciate that, thanks!
vha
Isn't it coffee time ?
Just to maintain the gas . . 
Just to maintain the gas . .
Getting more and more used to this lens, and as I see it the fun part is from 1,2 to 2,8 or so, so I`ll stay there ..
Just another everyday shot, having a coffee with a friend of mine, and she is a photographer too, sometimes its more convenient to be on the other side of the camera.
vha.
Tec : Kodak bw400cn at 1/60 and 1,2 (or was it 1,4 ?), with a M6, even a black one
Just to maintain the gas . .
Getting more and more used to this lens, and as I see it the fun part is from 1,2 to 2,8 or so, so I`ll stay there ..
Just another everyday shot, having a coffee with a friend of mine, and she is a photographer too, sometimes its more convenient to be on the other side of the camera.
vha.
Tec : Kodak bw400cn at 1/60 and 1,2 (or was it 1,4 ?), with a M6, even a black one
Attachments
principe azul
Ian
I have the 35 Ultron (happy with it, but I love speed) and I keep thinking about the Nokton. The few opinions I can find suggest the two lenses are comparable in the apertures they share. Any experience?
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
vha said:Getting more and more used to this lens, and as I see it the fun part is from 1,2 to 2,8 or so, so I`ll stay there ..
Just another everyday shot, having a coffee with a friend of mine, and she is a photographer too, sometimes its more convenient to be on the other side of the camera.
vha.
Tec : Kodak bw400cn at 1/60 and 1,2 (or was it 1,4 ?), with a M6, even a black one![]()
I just got this lens a little while ago. I haven't had much opportunity to put it to work, but seeing your shot, vha, has got me looking forward to it. Very nice.
summilux
Well-known
Last edited:
Dan Unkefer
Newbie
I have two 1.2 Lightsuckers, the Canon 1.2 and the Minolta MC Rokkor 1.2, I prefer the 50mm focal length. I have the 35 Ultron, butI'd like to test drive the 35 1.2 at some point. Quite a difference between 1.7 and 1.2, if you need it, you need it.
swoop
Well-known
Rich Silfver said:Does anyone have a photo of this lens mounted on an M body?
On an M7. I have a .85, and it doesn't cut in to the viewfinder much. I'm very used to the size since I use a 75 'lux all the time. The nokton 35 is about the same size but half the weight.


summilux
Well-known
Flyfisher Tom said:Don,
You meant to say Noctilux or Nokton ?
it is Cosina's "Noctilux"
summilux
Well-known
the red chain is close to original colour, it is those cheapo plastic one. looks ugly but is close to the original as I saw it.
I am dreaming for a M8 now...
:angel:
Last edited:
S
stevew
Guest
Mean thing to do!
Mean thing to do!
I keep dreaming about this lens, even though I don't shoot night scenes much anymore, I still want it. Those street scenes even though focused at 30 feet or so show the shallow depth of field. It is nice to isolate the focus in the closeups.
Mean thing to do!
I keep dreaming about this lens, even though I don't shoot night scenes much anymore, I still want it. Those street scenes even though focused at 30 feet or so show the shallow depth of field. It is nice to isolate the focus in the closeups.
amateriat
We're all light!
This...is a very dangerous thread...
- Barrett
- Barrett
MikeL
Go Fish
Shut this thread down now, or the price will go up!
summilux
Well-known
Last edited:
Summi, you are killing us.
Great stuff.
It is the photographer, not the lens, it is the photographer, not the lens. Keep repeating that (and I still want this lens).
Great stuff.
It is the photographer, not the lens, it is the photographer, not the lens. Keep repeating that (and I still want this lens).
Last edited:
tom_f77
Tom Fenwick
SteveM(PA)
Poser
think unsexy thoughts think unsexy thoughts 
dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
I <3 my 35 Nokton..
Dave
Dave
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.