scorpius73
Well-known
I do not really need another 50mm lens since I have the Nikon Millenium 50mm f1.4. But the Voigtlander 50mm f2.5 intrigues me. How is it with sharpness, contrast etc?
RanceEric
The name is Rance
I do not really need another 50mm lens since I have the Nikon Millenium 50mm f1.4. But the Voigtlander 50mm f2.5 intrigues me. How is it with sharpness, contrast etc?
There was a whole thread on it (I think LTM, but same lens) recently. Here it is: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=112860
I have been thinking about getting it, as cameraquest has a pretty decent sale price for it..
RanceEric
The name is Rance
and you can never have too many 50s 
scorpius73
Well-known
The price is the most intriguing part. That will be 2 50's for the Nikon RF and 4 for the Leica. Who's counting?
RanceEric
The name is Rance
The price is the most intriguing part. That will be 2 50's for the Nikon RF and 4 for the Leica. Who's counting?
For the price, it can't hurt to try it out!
scorpius73
Well-known
I think I just might do it. Doing my part to get this economy right one lens at a time.
RanceEric
The name is Rance
Doing my part to get this economy right one lens at a time.
Haha I like that.. Could get dangerous using that as a justification for buying gear
furcafe
Veteran
It's a fine, albeit slow, lens if that's what you're looking for. Then again, any 50mm lens that tops out @ f/2.5 had better be good!
The strange dome-shaped hood & large rear element do make for a relatively compact package. As for ergonomics, I would prefer a tighter aperture ring, but the same goes for the Millenium 50/1.4.
The strange dome-shaped hood & large rear element do make for a relatively compact package. As for ergonomics, I would prefer a tighter aperture ring, but the same goes for the Millenium 50/1.4.
There was a whole thread on it (I think LTM, but same lens) recently. Here it is: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=112860
I have been thinking about getting it, as cameraquest has a pretty decent sale price for it..
scorpius73
Well-known
It's a fine, albeit slow, lens if that's what you're looking for. Then again, any 50mm lens that tops out @ f/2.5 had better be good!
The strange dome-shaped hood & large rear element do make for a relatively compact package. As for ergonomics, I would prefer a tighter aperture ring, but the same goes for the Millenium 50/1.4.
I have the Voigtlander 40mm f2 SL II for my Nikon SLR. The domed hood is nice for compactness. I agree the aperture ring on the Millenium 50 could be tighter.
Tom A
RFF Sponsor

I have the 50f2.5 for the Nikon Rf. very sharp, slightly higher contrast than the Nikkor 50f2. The hood looks a bit strange, but works very well (except if you are eating croissants and have the camera hanging on your chest - it will accumulate crumbs!!!).
TriX, Stoeckler developer A4/B4 min. I think it was on a S3 or S2.
Tom A
RFF Sponsor

This would be the coolest "surf buggy" of all time! Nikon SP, Color Skopar 50f2.5 (S-mount), TriX in PCK developer.
scorpius73
Well-known
Thanks Tom, I am seriously thinking of picking one up because of the price. Nice shots.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.