What do you DISLIKE about your M9?

x-ray

x-ray

Veteran
Local time
4:15 PM
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
5,744
I try to resist the M9 but I have to admit I love using M's. Since my first M kit in 1968, I've loved the system and only for short times in that period have I not owned at least one.

Now I rarely shoot film even though IMO B&W is best done with film. No problem with digital, it's just a different process to get to the end point. I've been mostly digital in my commercial work for over twelve years and am now warming up to shooting it for my personal / documentary work.

I know the M system well but not the M digital. I know all the issues common to the film Ms an digital like inaccurate frame lines but what do up NOT LIKE about your M9? I know theyre not perfect and i understand the aesthetic about M's.

Talk me out of wanting one. If I do buy one it could be a used one.
 
That the ISO only goes down to 160 is my main gripe. I've been shooting with 2 stop ND filters on from sun-up till sundown lately.

Winter battery life is also quite poor for me- but it does get very cold here. When the warm weather arrives I have not found battery life to be a problem. I carry an extra but have never gone through two of them on a warm day. I don't look at the screen much tho, and have Auto Preview turned off. Wintertime I've had batteries go after three or four shots, and twenty minutes outside. That is pretty pathetic. I don't mind changing a battery every now and again, but that gets almost like loading film holders.
 
I would never go on a trip without some kind of backup camera. Shutter failure or sensor issues can be a problem. Reliability is my main gripe. I love the camera though!
 
The light meter stinks. It's too easy to fool with too-wide of a pattern.
It's too expensive.
Repairs are extremely expensive.
Aside from that it's the best digital tool for an M user. It makes amazing raw files that continually impress me even after owning mine for almost 2 years.

Phil Forrest
 
My friend just got back from a motorcycle trip in Africa, he rode from the very bottom to the very top with a M9 and its came through without a hitch. The only problem he found was it is hard to use one hande while riding, but after I explained.zone focusing he got it. I was looking at his photos and the colors are stunning. If I had that kind of change I would be tempted!

So I guess th only problem is the price.
 
ISO only routinely usable up to 1250-1600, which is too slow for much of the available darkness work I favor.

I also have a minor carryover gripe from the M7: the inability of the VF LED display to show shutter speeds when shooting manual.
 
Avotius said:
My friend just got back from a motorcycle trip in Africa, he rode from the very bottom to the very top with a M9 and its came through without a hitch. The only problem he found was it is hard to use one hande while riding, but after I explained.zone focusing he got it. I was looking at his photos and the colors are stunning. If I had that kind of change I would be tempted!

So I guess th only problem is the price.
Click to expand...

I shoot one-handed easily with the Thumbs-Up.

Harry
 
Price and rate of depreciation.

Oh, and those fanboys that come out to defend the camera whenever something negative is said about Leicas :)
 
wish the shutter were quieter

wish there was less chroma noise at 1600 and above

wish the lightmeter was more like my RD-1, or my M6

wish it had been a lot cheaper
 
Cold isn't a problem where I live in the south. Today and yesterday the temp hit 105f. Winters are warm generally. For 99% of my shooting cold is no issue.

I've read sever complaints about files not being written to the card. Tis is disturbing. How much of a problem is this?

If I buy one I'll most likely buy a used one from a dealer like Popflash where I can return it if I dont like it at least within a grace period.

Price, yes it's nuts. I just bought a Nikon D800 and will take delivery this week. I shoot Hasselblad digital and Canon but will phase out and sell the Canon if the Nikon meets my expectations. It in my opinion is a far superior camera to the M9 but there's something about an M. It's a mental illness I know. Therapy may help but like most disturbed folks I don't want help.

Keep telling me the dark side of the M9, I can handle it.
 
I hesitate making the Leica experience a digital one.
I am glad the camera is so expensive.
This way, I may stay away from it.
 
I recently went to NYC and Boston with an M9 and XP1 -- this was the Fuji's first trip and I was eager to see how it would perform. The M9 is still the ISO 160 champ, for me. If there is a "weakness" it is performance at ISO's higher than 1600. The low-ISO files have a level of detail that I could only get out of medium format film. The XP1 is a nice backup though. I have another trip this weekend and will take the M9, XP1 and Nikon D3. The XP1 and the M9 compliment each other nicely for how I use them. I think that the XP1 is the natural camera to reach for in very low light. Unlike others, I rather like the EVF on it. I certainly like knowing what's in focus with some of my "shiftier" lenses.

Ben
 
What about color issues with wides? If you don't code your lenses are there menu selections to deal with lens issues?

What reliability issues are we talking about?
 
I wouldn't say high ISO is its weakness.
If you expose the image properly, 2500 ISO is great.
No noise reduction, shot at 2500.
leicam9elmarit902500.jpg
 
Do you think a lot of the complaints are over blown? For me image quality and reliability trump the M experience.
 
First the standard gripes with which I don't agree:

The LCD. When I first got it I noticed it was inferior for checking focus or motion blur compared to my Fuji X100. But I now cannot see what I was complaining about and have no trouble with the LCD. Maybe it's run in......?

Battery life. Very good in my experience.

The high ISO. So it's no D3 but regularly having 800 ISO for colour and some useable ISO to dial up at a whim up to 1600 and even greater, maybe, in B and W is still better than the HP5 plus regularly in my Hexar.

My own gripes:

Total collapse using SanDisk cards. I'm fine since switching to Lexar.

Inferior frame line of the 50mm frame line is next to non-existent, and there seems no good reason. Really affects my enjoyment and ease shooting 50. I'll get used to it but haven't yet.

Louder than I would like, but in discreet mode not bad.

Having to take the baseplate on and off to get to the card. The cable no longer works for me and my Mac and Lightroom. It sort of works but I just get generic DNG preview images instead of the pictures.

Needs a thumbs up to hold but I don't want one or any such equivalent. I am managing.

Otherwise I love it. I use the Zeiss lenses down to 21, the f4.5. There is purple vignetting. I code the lenses to the nearest Leica equivalent and that works well. I have taken shots at 35, 50 and 90 and 135 while forgetting to recode and it mostly makes little difference.

I have no real problem with the meter. I shoot automatic and often continue after the first couple of automatic shots with manual settings.

The finders were so stiff going in the accessory shoe I was worried I would break something. Never had a new Leica before.

Do I regret blowing the money on this? No. It saved me buying a whole slew of Fuji lenses. Complaints on forums are always more noticeable. There are a lot of M9 users quietly enjoying their camera. A pro who shot me and my team for work was surprised I asked about a 50 1.4 on his EOS. We got talking. His own camera for the weekend: the M9. There are lots of accounts of how rough you can treat it, and we're all babying ours anyway. If it last ten years I'll be more than happy. I suspect it will last longer. And I have all the lenses I need. And I won't be buying 3 Nikon DSLRs in those ten years, or nearly so many rolls of film.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom