GaryLH
Veteran
cards were formatted in the fuji...
name was the same...
But did unaccidentally use the x100 file?
Gary
back alley
IMAGES
there is one file on the card, same name as the one i just downloaded...my computer shows the full file on the card but the camera will not recognize it.
the lens shows as ver. 2...must be a newer lens?
the body shows as ver. 1
does the lens have to be off the body when uploading the file?
the lens shows as ver. 2...must be a newer lens?
the body shows as ver. 1
does the lens have to be off the body when uploading the file?
GaryLH
Veteran
Nope lens does not have to off body that I am aware of..... But since lens has got later update, maybe worth trying. Otherwise I am stomped at moment.
Gary
Gary
back alley
IMAGES
lens off...still no go..
GaryLH
Veteran
Let's check file size
Let's check file size
The 2.0 xp1 file size is showing as 38.3mb on my iMac. Anything less would explain the issue, like 33mb for example.
Gary
Let's check file size
there is one file on the card, same name as the one i just downloaded...my computer shows the full file on the card but the camera will not recognize it.
the lens shows as ver. 2...must be a newer lens?
the body shows as ver. 1
does the lens have to be off the body when uploading the file?
The 2.0 xp1 file size is showing as 38.3mb on my iMac. Anything less would explain the issue, like 33mb for example.
Gary
edge100
Well-known
The 35 and the 60. As it happens, I don't use the 60 all that often.
I've since added the 18, which is a terrific lens, though a bit wide for some uses.
If I had to pick one lens, it would be the 35.
I've since added the 18, which is a terrific lens, though a bit wide for some uses.
If I had to pick one lens, it would be the 35.
GaryLH
Veteran
The 2.0 xp1 file size is showing as 38.3mb on my iMac. Anything less would explain the issue, like 33mb for example.
Gary
Forgot to mention camera SW will first check for exact file name "fpupdate.dat".
Most embedded SW developers would next check for file corruption by looking at header info in file for on camera type match, check sum and total file length. Could even be looking for a magic number field a well.
Gary
back alley
IMAGES
The 2.0 xp1 file size is showing as 38.3mb on my iMac. Anything less would explain the issue, like 33mb for example.
Gary
same here...tho the file is supposed to be 36. something...
getting dark here...day wasted...pissed off...
back alley
IMAGES
Forgot to mention camera SW will first check for exact file name "fpupdate.dat".
Most embedded SW developers would next check for file corruption by looking at header info in file for on camera type match, check sum and total file length. Could even be looking for a magic number field a well.
Gary
no idea what this means...
GaryLH
Veteran
Just an FYI on how many possible things need to be checked before the camera SW will allow the upgrade to take next step.
Gary
Gary
GaryLH
Veteran
same here...tho the file is supposed to be 36. something...
getting dark here...day wasted...pissed off...
Try another down load. Could be a download related issue from Fuji website.
Gary
willie_901
Veteran
I stared with the Fujinon 35. The 35 is excellent in every way. I really love that lens. I find I have to use a faster shutter speed than I expected to get the most out of the lens. I guess I'm just getting shaky in my old age. Also, the default Lightroom sharpening parameters don't give the best results either.
Then I added the 18. The 18 is not as good as the 35, which I'm sure you know. Though it is very good. The speed is useful in low light.
I skipped the 60 mm lens because I did not want a macro lens. Next year I will pick up the 23/1.4 and the 56/1.4.
Then I added the 18. The 18 is not as good as the 35, which I'm sure you know. Though it is very good. The speed is useful in low light.
I skipped the 60 mm lens because I did not want a macro lens. Next year I will pick up the 23/1.4 and the 56/1.4.
back alley
IMAGES
Try another down load. Could be a download related issue from Fuji website.
Gary
downloaded it about 6 times...trying it yet again now...
GaryLH
Veteran
If u already downloaded 6 times. Then odds are it is not a download issue.
I am totally stumped. Time to c if someone local to where u live can help out.
Gary
I am totally stumped. Time to c if someone local to where u live can help out.
Gary
Herjulfr
Established
You're not lucky, firmware updates went smoothly here. Do you have any error messages, or warnings?
back alley
IMAGES
no error messages...i remembered reading awhile back that after formatting the card to take a pic on the card as well.
it didn't work.
i have upgraded other cameras without a glitch before...i have tried 3 different cards and 2 different brands...
gary, i appreciate the effort...will bring in the camera to the shop tomorrow and ask the 'experts'...
it didn't work.
i have upgraded other cameras without a glitch before...i have tried 3 different cards and 2 different brands...
gary, i appreciate the effort...will bring in the camera to the shop tomorrow and ask the 'experts'...
back alley
IMAGES
i read that the card reader needs to be plugged directly into the computer and not into a hub so i tried that...nothing!
Herjulfr
Established
Anyway, you can use it without the upgrade. Although it is a little dark outside now 
back alley
IMAGES
tomorrow, i guess...
GaryLH
Veteran
Only other thing I can think of is to try one of the earlier fw updates like the one prior to 2.0.
Gary
Gary
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.