mirrored
Established
Hello! I hear that old version would be more valued than some others. Question is on Summicron 35/2 crome without gogles and its serial number is 1996* from year 1963, 8 element - told by the seller. Is it true and why it is that way? Is there something like 50/2 DR have, "best for B&W"?
mirrored
Established
Yes here is a summary of the various types and their characteristics
http://members.aol.com/dcolucci/35summicron.htm
Where can find that now?
fbf
Well-known
mirrored
Established
Thank you.
(I don't know why this thread rise over again up. And this is happened several times. I mean that I see sended last post some minutes ago, but entering to the thread, there is all in order again: posted 14 hours ago.)
Last edited:
mirrored
Established
"My preferred Cron 35 is the first version, the 8 elements, a true magical lens."
I know this little stupid question, but how much would be correct price for one? A low price in that situation what I have when one is buyable to me and seller have not find buyer for a while, asking 750€. Average weared but good lens. M2 chrome.
I suppose prises have dropped much in a year! There is some lens generation change and new alternatives much.
I know this little stupid question, but how much would be correct price for one? A low price in that situation what I have when one is buyable to me and seller have not find buyer for a while, asking 750€. Average weared but good lens. M2 chrome.
I suppose prises have dropped much in a year! There is some lens generation change and new alternatives much.
Last edited:
mirrored
Established
Can I use M3 version (gogles) without gogles? Is it same lens other way than M2 version?
mirrored
Established
Can I use M3 version (gogles) without gogles? Is it same lens other way than M2 version?
Do somebody know?
HuubL
hunter-gatherer
Hi Mirrored. Welcome to RFF. This is an often asked (and answered question). Search the forums. You could save the following Javascript as a bookmark for searches of the RFF forums (note that that the entire string is on one line, without spaces and line breaks):
javascript:X=escape(getSelection());if(!X)%7Bvoid(X=prompt('Search%20RFF%20for',''))%7D;if(X!=null)location.href='http://www.google.com/search?rls=en-us&q='+escape(X)+'%20site:rangefinderforum.com&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8'
In short, the answer on your question is NO!
javascript:X=escape(getSelection());if(!X)%7Bvoid(X=prompt('Search%20RFF%20for',''))%7D;if(X!=null)location.href='http://www.google.com/search?rls=en-us&q='+escape(X)+'%20site:rangefinderforum.com&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8'
In short, the answer on your question is NO!
mirrored
Established
Thanks. I have search very much without success. Can't find successfull words for search.
(Unfortunately I can't understand what is javascript and how it works. adding: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=947720#post947720)
With gogles is offered much cheaper ones.
I start a new thread:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=67174
(Unfortunately I can't understand what is javascript and how it works. adding: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=947720#post947720)
With gogles is offered much cheaper ones.
I start a new thread:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=67174
Last edited:
ferider
Veteran
Hi Mirrored,
lenses with goggles have the focus mechanism adapted to the goggles. The goggles enlarge the Field of View by factor 1.4, to make 50mm framelines usable for 35. When you remove them, (1) the camera will still show the 50mm framelines, and (2) the focus will be wrong. For example, when (without goggles) you focus the camera at an object at 1m distance, the lens will focus at less than .7m, and the resulting picture will be heavily front-focused.
A lens that was designed to be used with goggles has to be used with them, also on a camera with 35mm framelines.
Best,
Roland.
lenses with goggles have the focus mechanism adapted to the goggles. The goggles enlarge the Field of View by factor 1.4, to make 50mm framelines usable for 35. When you remove them, (1) the camera will still show the 50mm framelines, and (2) the focus will be wrong. For example, when (without goggles) you focus the camera at an object at 1m distance, the lens will focus at less than .7m, and the resulting picture will be heavily front-focused.
A lens that was designed to be used with goggles has to be used with them, also on a camera with 35mm framelines.
Best,
Roland.
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
I know it's not one of the lens choices but I've been really really enjoying the 35 Summilux Asph


Erik L
Well-known
Some were made and marked Wetzlar. Wetzlar lenses bring a premium.
mine says Wetzlar. whats my version 1 worth?
mr roberts
Just R
Summicron 35 v2
Summicron 35 v2
I was surprised to see that the switch from series 7 filters occurred in the Cron 35 v3 (http://www.antiquecameras.net/35summicronmlenses.html). Mine is a v2 with the aperture tab and a serial number in the mid v2 range, but takes 39mm filters and uses the #12504 hood that takes the 7 filters. Best of both worlds, I guess.
I'm not a fan of the round hood though. Is it possible to use the v4's rectangular hood on this lens? I don't have access to one to try it out before ordering so I'm hoping for a yea or nay here.
Thanks,
Bob
Summicron 35 v2
I was surprised to see that the switch from series 7 filters occurred in the Cron 35 v3 (http://www.antiquecameras.net/35summicronmlenses.html). Mine is a v2 with the aperture tab and a serial number in the mid v2 range, but takes 39mm filters and uses the #12504 hood that takes the 7 filters. Best of both worlds, I guess.
I'm not a fan of the round hood though. Is it possible to use the v4's rectangular hood on this lens? I don't have access to one to try it out before ordering so I'm hoping for a yea or nay here.
Thanks,
Bob
Rico
Well-known
My v3 was retail-packaged with a 12504, and it should fit any 35 'cron and later Summarons. As for the v4 hood, it has a protruding tab (for orientation) that makes it unusable on earlier 'crons - without surgery anyway.
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
maddoc
... likes film again.
DougFord
on the good foot
I've owned (since sold) both of these lenses at one point and much prefer the IV version. My current favorite 35mm lens is the Zeiss c-biogon 2.8, 'better' than either of them at the available apertures to my eye.
dovevadar
DoveVadar
I have came across some asph 35 summicron in screw thread mount. anyone has anything to say about any "micro front/back focusing" when used with an L39-M adapter? it will be nice if I could use it on a IIIg or should I just go for the m-mount.? what are the pros and cons?
Erik van Straten
Veteran
The first Summicron 35mm, with 8 elements, is not bad either.
Erik.
Erik.
Rogrund
Antti Sivén
The 35/2 v3 is OK, too...

Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.