kshapero
South Florida Man
Bessa R4x"s do not respond. Does anyone shoot a 21 mm lens or wider without an external VF? For me they physically get in the way. So can one get desired composition w/o the Ext VF? I don't see focusing as much of a problem, just decent composition. Or is it just full of surprises?
Michael Markey
Veteran
Me .
I find them a pain too.
I find them a pain too.
robbeiflex
Well-known
I've used it on the ZM, and it seems to capture quite a bit more than to the edges of the viewfinder, sometimes a pleasant surprise and then sometimes the stereotypical finger in the picture. This is very unscientific and my own opinion (except for the finger - its definitely there!), and to be honest I've started using a 28mm instead and do prefer that since the ZM has a frameline for it. I've heard that people use the full ZM finder to approximate a 24 or 25 mm lens and that sounds more reasonable.
Avotius
Some guy
I use a CV 21mm finder. Frankly I cant think of a reason not to use it, depth of field is so huge that focusing is really easy and with auto exposure and a basic understanding of light and metering it should not be all that much trouble. If you dont like the bulk of a viewfinder there is always an SLR with the same focal length you could use.
Benjamin Marks
Veteran
I recently bought a Zeiss 21 in M-mount and really, really like it. I have had a Nikon 20mm lens for 20 years, but have not used it nearly as much. I have used a finder, but am about 50/50 in actual use. On the M8, the view of a 28mm finder is about right. On an E-P2 there is no issue as you see through the lens, but with that combo I do focus and frame using the camera's EVF.
cliffpov
Established
I use the CV21 more often with the finder. Sometimes I use it w/o the finder on the M3 or CL. The CV21 also is effective on the m4/3 camera's as a 42mm lens.
hans voralberg
Veteran
I dont use finder 50% of the time, just point and shoot, I just need the centre bit, the rest is surprise 
helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
I have always shot the 21
Without a VF
In general i prefer less
I just center the main point of view
Slightly tilt the 21 SA
For additional Edge
and SHOOT
Never really had a problem in my compositions
I have a '21' set on flickr
Cheers-H
Without a VF
In general i prefer less
I just center the main point of view
Slightly tilt the 21 SA
For additional Edge
and SHOOT
Never really had a problem in my compositions
I have a '21' set on flickr
Cheers-H
Last edited:
MickH
Well-known
I'm currently shooting a CV15 on an R4a without the external viewfinder ( I know you asked us not to respond, but I guess the 15mm presents me with similar problems to yours with the 21mm). I use the integral viewfinder to compose the central area of the photograph, and just hope my fingers aren't in the way!
I'm looking at buying a Bessa L and shooting 'blind' - until I get my hands on a cheap enough external v/f. I should get a few surprises on the way.
I'm looking at buying a Bessa L and shooting 'blind' - until I get my hands on a cheap enough external v/f. I should get a few surprises on the way.
wkkato
wkkato
I use an R2S with the 21mm but use it without the viewfinder, which is in a drawer someplace. But I find that if I just move my eyeball around to the extremes past the framing lines, it approximates the field of view pretty well. I don't know what other viewfinders look like though. However, the 25mm and 28mm are a bit more problematic to approximate.
hteasley
Pupil
I just got a 21/2,8 Biogon with a 25/28 finder (for my M8) and spent the day shooting it, and I like the finder a lot. I was much less comfortable not using it.
Krosya
Konicaze
I use 21 on M5 and Hexar RF (Better on Hexar) w/o external VF all the time and wit some practice it works Ok for me. I do have an external VF for my 21mm but use it only about 10% of the time.
SimonSawSunlight
Simon Fabel
I do, it works ok. but I admit I'd prefer having a 21mm EVF. especially for use on my MDa.
ampguy
Veteran
I do, CV 21/4 with the full VF of the M8, primarily landscapes, so I can chimp if there are framing or edges I want to include/exclude. The whole VF is probably excliding an extra 10-15% of what the 21 gives on the image, depending on your eyepoint position.
Fuchs
Well-known
I have shot with the Elmarit-M 21/2.8 on my M6 always without the external VF. Some months ago I got one of the CV's. Was totally pissed off by it until its foot just mysteriously broke and never used it again.
kshapero
South Florida Man
I like thisI have always shot the 21
Without a VF
In general i prefer less
I just center the main point of view
Slightly tilt the 21 SA
For additional Edge
and SHOOT
Never really had a problem in my compositions
I have a '21' set on flickr
Cheers-H
I go for the VF... just take steps to make it secure in the accessory shoe, whether that means tightening up the shoe rails, adding a shim, or using a rubber band under the lens and around behind the VF to hold it in place!
My first 21 was the Biogon-G, and my idea was to just let the camera's AE and AF do their jobs while I viewed the world through the big bright external VF. That worked out pretty well. I really don't mind having that gizmo on top, and it does seem to make other people double-take to see it. That can lead to a photo-op...
My first 21 was the Biogon-G, and my idea was to just let the camera's AE and AF do their jobs while I viewed the world through the big bright external VF. That worked out pretty well. I really don't mind having that gizmo on top, and it does seem to make other people double-take to see it. That can lead to a photo-op...
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.