batey_1020
Well-known
Im pleased to say i had a very nice phone call today. MY mum had found the rest of her Fathers leica equipment being a Summicron 35 f2 Canadian version and a Elmarit 90 f2.8. I dont know of the condition yet since my parents are a few hours away but apparently in there containers and boxed.
Lets just say im very happy i didnt jump in and buy anything last week
Lets just say im very happy i didnt jump in and buy anything last week
sanmich
Veteran
sell the 3.5
buy the color skopar 2.5
wow! magic!! you're still with 750$ in you pocket
(about 35mm: anything wider will require an external VF...)
buy the color skopar 2.5
wow! magic!! you're still with 750$ in you pocket
(about 35mm: anything wider will require an external VF...)
LChanyungco
Well-known
No 28mm lines in an M4 ? i don't remember...
sell the 3.5
buy the color skopar 2.5
wow! magic!! you're still with 750$ in you pocket
(about 35mm: anything wider will require an external VF...)
sanmich
Veteran
Only on M4-P as far as I recall.No 28mm lines in an M4 ? i don't remember...
and then, barely usable...
Vincent.G
Well-known
Im after a new lens for my M4. Im on a very limited budget at the moment and inherriated the M4 with a 50mm f2 and a 50mm f3.5. I have sold of my Canon 60D that i would commonly use with a 17-40 F4. The sale of the gear has left me with enough money to Get a CLA on both the M4 and lenses and leaving me with about $750.
So with the remaining $750 i was considering one of the following lenses as a fill in for 12 months or so until i can afford something better.
Voigtlander 21mm F4 with the 21-25 finder
Voigtlander 35mm f1.4
Voigtlander 40mm f1.4 with the 40mm viewfinder
So if you were on a limited budget like myself what would you go for?
I have been looking at the color skopar 21mm f4 for a while. It is a very good lens in my opinion. Should be a good complement to your 50mm lens.
umcelinho
Marcelo
i'd say voigtlander 21/4, ultron 35/1.7, canon 35/2 or if you want to go extreme, a 15/4.5. its extremely wide and complements well a 50. the 21 would complement well too.
maybe a 35 would be the best bet, just keep both as normals, leaving home with only one according to the place where you'll be shooting at. no changing lenses = no hassle
maybe a 35 would be the best bet, just keep both as normals, leaving home with only one according to the place where you'll be shooting at. no changing lenses = no hassle
JChrome
Street Worker
I shoot 21mm 30% of the time and 35mm 70% of the time. I do have some nice nikkors that are longer I just rarely reach for them.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Bittersweet news, of course, but what a lovely souvenir to have of your grandfather.Im pleased to say i had a very nice phone call today. MY mum had found the rest of her Fathers leica equipment being a Summicron 35 f2 Canadian version and a Elmarit 90 f2.8. I dont know of the condition yet since my parents are a few hours away but apparently in there containers and boxed.
Lets just say im very happy i didnt jump in and buy anything last week![]()
Now would be the time to look at a 21...
Cheers,
R.
Spicy
Well-known
Yeah, perhaps the 21/4.5 zeiss. When you go out, bring only the 21/50 combo or the 35/90 combo, depending on where you're planning on going. Voila!
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Actusally, there's a lot to be said for 18-35-75-135: doubling the focal length, reducing the image area to a quarter.
Cheers,
R.
Cheers,
R.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.