Teuthida
Well-known
This thing will take stunning pictures of my cats.
Archlich
Well-known
I will be a better person donating one of these to the UNICEF.
wjlapier
Well-known
Maybe. The .95 Nocti is on my list. BTW, isn't the 50 'lux ASPH an APO lens too?
Film dino
David Chong
Ditto (+ mandatory message lengthening)I am not a member of Leica's target market.
kokoshawnuff
Alex
BTW, isn't the 50 'lux ASPH an APO lens too?
Not yet....
robklurfield
eclipse
If you sell one kidney to finance the new M-monochrom; then you sell the second to pay for this APO Asph, then what do you do? Dialysis? Go back to film? What?
I applaud Leica for being able to do this stuff. But, it's all way, way beyond my budget or needs.
I applaud Leica for being able to do this stuff. But, it's all way, way beyond my budget or needs.
robklurfield
eclipse
Given that I'm color blind (admit it; you could tell from my postings), near sighted (ditto) and suffer from astigmatism, why the heck do I want to pay $7,150 for a lens that sees better than I do?
However, if I were I rich man, I might consider such an extravagance.
However, if I were I rich man, I might consider such an extravagance.
Jubb Jubb
Well-known
what a joke. $8,000. Leica have absolutely no idea.
Timmyjoe
Veteran
I'd rather buy a Noct. F0.95 ASPH.
My point exactly. What was the purpose of Leica coming out with an f2 lens that is three quarters the price of the f0.95 lens they already sell? I'm baffled.
Best,
-Tim
What was the purpose of Leica coming out with an f2 lens that is three quarters the price of the f0.95 lens they already sell? I'm baffled.
The snake oil salesmen will let us know very soon.
Thardy
Veteran
The price makes it jewelry.
It's the perfect lens for well-to-do doctors, dentists, successful(not incarcerated)hedge fund managers, and former Russian presidents.
I'm sure it has a very high level of aberration correction.
Even "well to do" doctors don't buy this type of stuff. It's not like money just magically appears in your bank account.
Even "well to do" doctors don't buy this type of stuff. It's not like money just magically appears in your bank account.
Yeah, my Doctor has an M8 that he bought used because he couldn't spend the cash on the M9.
gavinlg
Veteran
Yeah wtf. In actual use, on a film camera or an m9, how much more can the actual medium resolve than a $800 zeiss 50mm planar, which is already one of the best 50mm's on the market.
This is just a whole pile of WTF.
This is just a whole pile of WTF.
Araakii
Well-known
I just read today from NY times that 7% of american households have over $1M in cash. This lens is not even 1% of that, plus you don't actually spend $7K to use it. You only spend $7K - whatever depreciation there will be.
For those who think that this lens will not sell. Well, how about talk about that when it's actually on the market. For those who prefer the 50 lux or 50 noct, what if the buyer already owns all of those but still has so much cash lying around?
The more high end lenses Leica makes the better. Because if someone is not buying this, they would spend the money on another watch, or handbag, or tires for a car. I would rather have Leica make this money than Ferrari or Rolex or whatever.
For those who think that this lens will not sell. Well, how about talk about that when it's actually on the market. For those who prefer the 50 lux or 50 noct, what if the buyer already owns all of those but still has so much cash lying around?
The more high end lenses Leica makes the better. Because if someone is not buying this, they would spend the money on another watch, or handbag, or tires for a car. I would rather have Leica make this money than Ferrari or Rolex or whatever.
Vickko
Veteran
Hmmm. I didn't pay the $5K for a 35mm f1.4 ASPH-FLE when mine arrived.
I'm thinking no, to the 50/2 ASPH.
But, one never knows.
Let's see a few performance reviews.
I'm thinking no, to the 50/2 ASPH.
But, one never knows.
Let's see a few performance reviews.
Biggles
My cup runneth amok.
I've never paid that much for a car.
axiom
Non-Registered User
Apparently, Leica's pricing scheme is based on the supply-demand of the 35luxFLE.
They saw people were willing to pay $7k for the then-new 35luxFLE, so they said, why don't they charge that much to begin with.
They saw people were willing to pay $7k for the then-new 35luxFLE, so they said, why don't they charge that much to begin with.
axiom
Non-Registered User
and by the way, the next new Leica lens will probably be an APO 35mm cron with a $9k price tag (if not more)
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.