X100 replacement next year?
- Thread starter macjim
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 22
- Views 3K
macjim
Well-known
Here's a quote from the article:
So the question becomes: is this a camera you could use for a real job? Yes and no. the IQ is definitely there, and the JPEGS are so good out of the box that you can supply them directly to a client. I recently shot a commercial job for an editorial client and sent him the JPEg direct, fully expecting him to come back and ask for TIFFs. To my surprise he called me back to say how clean and usable they were. I didn’t tell him what I had shot them on. I know of a well- known food shooter who is using an X-series for his work. Carefully shot and processed it is possible to get an A0 print from this sensor. remember too, that the range of raw convert-
ers for any camera based on the X-Trans sensor is limited, including the replacement for the X100, due out early next year, which will use it as well. However the perception among the uneducated that you have to have Big gear to be a Real Pro still exists. You might struggle to convince a wedding client that you were for real with such a small camera...until they saw the results. Interestingly, this camera system is be- coming increasingly used by wedding profes- sionals overseas.
My only other annoyance with what is otherwise a fantastic camera is that they have not fixed the issue with minimum shutter speeds on Auto ISO. The X100 allows you to do this, so why not the X-Pro1 or X-E1? Mr Fujifilm, please!
So the question becomes: is this a camera you could use for a real job? Yes and no. the IQ is definitely there, and the JPEGS are so good out of the box that you can supply them directly to a client. I recently shot a commercial job for an editorial client and sent him the JPEg direct, fully expecting him to come back and ask for TIFFs. To my surprise he called me back to say how clean and usable they were. I didn’t tell him what I had shot them on. I know of a well- known food shooter who is using an X-series for his work. Carefully shot and processed it is possible to get an A0 print from this sensor. remember too, that the range of raw convert-
ers for any camera based on the X-Trans sensor is limited, including the replacement for the X100, due out early next year, which will use it as well. However the perception among the uneducated that you have to have Big gear to be a Real Pro still exists. You might struggle to convince a wedding client that you were for real with such a small camera...until they saw the results. Interestingly, this camera system is be- coming increasingly used by wedding profes- sionals overseas.
My only other annoyance with what is otherwise a fantastic camera is that they have not fixed the issue with minimum shutter speeds on Auto ISO. The X100 allows you to do this, so why not the X-Pro1 or X-E1? Mr Fujifilm, please!
f16sunshine
Moderator
If the x'trans sensor will be in the new camera, the "classic" x100 will likely begin to see a cult status. I love the reasonably small sized RAW files from the current x100.
Would not trade them for larger files from a poorly supported (and much loved by me anyway) x'trans sensor as the xp1 has.
Even with RAW support in the future, the lower MP x100 is a handy tool.
Would not trade them for larger files from a poorly supported (and much loved by me anyway) x'trans sensor as the xp1 has.
Even with RAW support in the future, the lower MP x100 is a handy tool.
GaryLH
Veteran
There are the other consumer x series as well
There are the other consumer x series as well
Since the rumor says announcement is in or around time of ces, this puts the announcement about
- x100
- x10
- xf1
- xs1
As all possibilities... 😀
Gary
There are the other consumer x series as well
Since the rumor says announcement is in or around time of ces, this puts the announcement about
- x100
- x10
- xf1
- xs1
As all possibilities... 😀
Gary
GaryLH
Veteran
I would love to c an xtran version of the x100 or a 20mp+ Bayer sensor replacement. Probably would not buy one until my x100 gives up the ghost though.
Gary
Paul T.
Veteran
It would make sense for them to rationalise the sensors. I'll be happy if that's all they do, as it means mine won't be rendered obselete.
I've had no problems submitting files for a full page bleed from X100. For my mind, it's the focusing that's the biggest limitation; more specifically, the need to keep switching to macro mode, which I find the most clunky aspect of the camera.
I've had no problems submitting files for a full page bleed from X100. For my mind, it's the focusing that's the biggest limitation; more specifically, the need to keep switching to macro mode, which I find the most clunky aspect of the camera.
Przemek
[' o°]
Plenty happy with X100 IQ so far. I wish for a wider focal length, though it would be cool if it had a discrete multi focal length a'la tri-elmar but not for the price of jacket-pocket-ability 😉
umcelinho
Marcelo
if:
- f/1.4
- better AF with no 1m limitation
- improved IQ
- black
i'm sold
- f/1.4
- better AF with no 1m limitation
- improved IQ
- black
i'm sold
bwcolor
Veteran
I need to sell cameras to fund a FF mirrorless and the X100 should be sold, but this is like saying goodbye to your best friend. It is hard to do. The 100 has been a great camera and functions perfectly.
jsrockit
Moderator
I'll take one no problem. Love the X100 and love the X-Pro1. I would like to see pretty much the same camera with an updated sensor (or even full frame) and for them to add more robust dials and buttons (like the X-Pro1 / X-E1). Faster AF would be very nice.
GaryLH
Veteran
More fuel for the fire 😀
More fuel for the fire 😀
http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/confirmed-new-fuji-x100-successor-with-x-trans-sensor-coming-soon/
Gary
More fuel for the fire 😀
http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/confirmed-new-fuji-x100-successor-with-x-trans-sensor-coming-soon/
Gary
Photosynthetech
Established
I hope it is a different focal length. I would love to have a leaf shutter on a 50, 75, 90, or 105 equivalent.
My x100 is great for weddings because of the flash sync speed.
My x100 is great for weddings because of the flash sync speed.
gavinlg
Veteran
This will be such a good camera with the X-trans sensor. The current bayer unit is good, but after using the x-pro1 that special sensor is just so much nicer than the bayer.
My personal wish list -
1. Revised lens - despite the current 23mm being an amazing little lens, f1.8 would be perfect and improved bokeh would be a big plus.
2. Rear controls from x-pro1.
3. Filter ring on the lens.
My personal wish list -
1. Revised lens - despite the current 23mm being an amazing little lens, f1.8 would be perfect and improved bokeh would be a big plus.
2. Rear controls from x-pro1.
3. Filter ring on the lens.
bobbyrab
Well-known
Am I the only one to prefer the colours from the X100 over the X-Pro1?
gavinlg
Veteran
Have you shot with an x-pro1/xe-1? (not in an inflammatory way - just curious.)
dct
perpetual amateur
So you are funding for the new M-240? Or are there other serious (with integrated VF) FF mirrorless digital around? 🙄 Makes me envious.
More likely I will go the X200 route. Or X-Pro1...
bobbyrab
Well-known
I've a friend who has one so I've messed around with it but not with the files themselves. I'm going by what I see posted here and elsewhere, and then it's more a liking for the X100 files than a dislike of the pro-1.
macjim
Well-known
jsrockit
Moderator
I can't see anyone ever making a fixed lens telephoto camera.
PatrickT
New Rangefinder User
I love my X100, but for the next version, I would love to have:
23mm f/1.8 or 1/4.
OR
35mm f/1.8 or 1.4.
Faster AF
Better high ISO
Better EVF
...and that's it.
23mm f/1.8 or 1/4.
OR
35mm f/1.8 or 1.4.
Faster AF
Better high ISO
Better EVF
...and that's it.
Similar threads
