What did you find to be better than expected?

[Disappointed_Horse]

I agree, Takumars proved to be much better than I expected. Pentax-m lenses too.
I use Nikon most of the time, that is because their cameras just work well and the lenses do the job. But I think Zuiko and Takumars are better than I initially thought.

I only have one K-mount lens, which is a 50mm f/2 SMC Pentax M that came with my K1000. It's an excellent performer as well.

I do slightly prefer my Nikon cameras to my Pentaxs—the viewfinders are a bit bigger and brighter, and agree with my eyes a bit more. I'm also not as keen on the K-mount models other than the K1000, KM, and KX, and the KM and KX were only produced for a few years. The Nikons I like (the FE/FM series, F, and F2) had longer production runs and while I don't think either the KM or KX are particularly hard to find, there are a lot more of the Nikons out there. But if I hadn't alreay bought into the Nikon system, I would be perfectly happy to stay with Pentax.

I had an OM-1MD for a while and liked it too, but it needed service and I figured I was already invested in F, M42, and K mount, so adding another mount wouldn't make much sense. I ended up selling the OM-1

 

[das]

The list is long. But some my favorites that were so much better than I would have expected, given the internet noise:

Bessa R4 series: Probably the best wide angle film RF platform ever.
Konica 50mm f/1.9 and 50mm f/3.5: Old 1950s M39 lenses never sold in the North American market that are both world class.
Carl Zeiss Jena 200mm f/2.8 (M42), 25mm f/4 Flektogon (M42), and 50mm f/1.4 (PB Mount): Under-appreciated, top-tier of the era film lenses.
Zeiss 35mm f/3.4 Skoparex (M42 / Icarex Bayonet): Voigtlander-designed, one of the best 35mm focal length SLR lenses of the pre-ASPH era.
Nikon 35mm f/2.5 S Mount: Almost the equal of the f/2.8 Summaron.
Konica 21-35mm f/3.4-4 Dual Hexanon: Fantastic at both focal lengths. An OG Tri-Elmar killer.

 

[Tim Murphy]

A few years ago I found a nice Pentax Spotmatic with a 50mm f/1.4 Super Takumar lens at a camera shop. The meter didn't work, but it was otherwise in very nice shape. I negotiated the seller down to $20 and it was mine.

Other than the non-functioning meter, the camera turned out to be an excellent performer. To my surprise, I found I enjoyed shooting without an internal meter. And I was blown away by how good the Takumar lenses are. I am not sure why (maybe slightly greater contrast?), but I find the images from the Takumar lense more appealing than what I get from my Nikkor lenses. So, the Pentax M42 cameras and Takumar lenses definitely exceeded my expectations.

Dear Disappointed_Horse,

I scored a working Spotmatic F with a case and a 55mm f1.8 SMC Takumar for $ 18.00 from Shopgoodwill a few years ago. It quickly became a favorite because it worked 100% and just felt good in my hands. I've since added a collection of Takumar's from 28mm to 400mm, along with a few more bodies bought with the caveat of "condition unknown" and man do I like everything I've bought.

Regards,

Tim Murphy

Harrisburg PA 🙂

 

[Out to Lunch]

"What did you find to be better than expected?"​

As a child, brussels sprouts.

 

[Tim Murphy]

"What did you find to be better than expected?"​

As a child, brussels sprouts.

Dear Out to Lunch,

At what age do they get better? I'm almost 66 and still waiting! 😉

Regards,

Tim Murphy

Harrisburg PA 🙂

 

[mrtoml]

Dear Out to Lunch,

At what age do they get better? I'm almost 66 and still waiting! 😉

Regards,

Tim Murphy

Harrisburg PA 🙂

Try roasting them with lemon juice, olive oil and thyme. They are completely transformed.

 

[mrtoml]

For me one surprise has been the quality of many 'kit lenses' over the years. Looking through my archives I am often surprised at just how good some of them are.

 

[raydm6]

• Leica IIIf
• Pentax ME

 

[Dogman]

The bargain priced bottom end Viltrox lenses for Nikon Z. At least the first one I bought was better than expected. The others have all been excellent--just as I expected them to be.





......................................

 

[splitimageview]

Nikon 35mm f/2.5 S Mount: Almost the equal of the f/2.8 Summaron.

I would argue *the* equal - after my direct comparison photos between the two, it was pretty much impossible to determine which was which. 🙂