And lastly, here’s some crops of the bokeh, taken from right side. So that’s it, I won’t bore you all with any more of these comparison shots 😉
@ F1.4
@ F2
@ F2.8
@ F4
@ F5.6
@ F1.4
@ F2
@ F2.8
@ F4
@ F5.6
35/1.4 shootout take II
- Thread starter jonmanjiro
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 46
- Views 14K
porktaco
Well-known
sort of amazing how closely the SC and the pre asph lux render bokeh
Filzkoeter
stray animal
Thanks for the awesome comparisons!
Is it possible to post the full f1.4 images from the Asph and pre-Asph for comparison of the full image between the 4 lenses?
The bokeh crops show what I'm always telling, the bokeh of the pre-asph looks as harsh as the Nokton bokeh at 1.4 (as a matter of fact the bokeh of most fast 35mm looks kinda harsh wide open) The nokton get's much smoother at 2.0. From 2.8 on all lenses level out and seem to start looking very much the same in the bokeh compartement.
Is it possible to post the full f1.4 images from the Asph and pre-Asph for comparison of the full image between the 4 lenses?
The bokeh crops show what I'm always telling, the bokeh of the pre-asph looks as harsh as the Nokton bokeh at 1.4 (as a matter of fact the bokeh of most fast 35mm looks kinda harsh wide open) The nokton get's much smoother at 2.0. From 2.8 on all lenses level out and seem to start looking very much the same in the bokeh compartement.
brbo
Well-known
Wow, Nokton's focus shift is in a "Sonnar league".
I had Nokton 40 and never noticed it shifting so much. Maybe 40 is a bit better than 35 in that regard?
I had Nokton 40 and never noticed it shifting so much. Maybe 40 is a bit better than 35 in that regard?
Just added them to the post with the other two full images.
semilog
curmudgeonly optimist
Great stuff! Focus on the nose when shooting portraits with the ASPH at f/4…
uhoh7
Veteran
The Nokton also seems to be back focusing wide open....well something is strange there, then it comes forward at f/2 and back again after.
I would question the calibration of that copy, or perhaps the shooter just missed, which as we all know is not hard to do. That degree of focus shift would be famous if it applied to all the CV 35/1.4 lenses.
But check the DOF of the Nokton wide open. It goes way back.
Focus was not adjusted between shots. Only the aperture was adjusted. The camera was on a tripod and the shutter was fired using a cable release. I think the main problem is that the Nokton is a bit soft wide open which makes the focus point not as clear as it otherwise could be.
Lss
Well-known
It is famous! 🙂
It looks quite normal based on a quick look. Just check the bottom left-hand corner of the crop.
uhoh7
Veteran
Looking at the wide open CV shot note blur in front and compare to back, then to others. In fact the lens seems pretty clearly back focused to me in all the last set of shots. At first I thought f/2 was right on, but now I think it is back as well. The rest of the lenses are spot on.
I've shot the CV 35/1.4 quite a bit on the M9, though it's not my main 35. I never had big problems with focus shift.
L1016886 by unoh7, WO
next day at f/4:
L1016962 by unoh7, on Flickr
am I just lucky?
This is the MC version, but that can't make a difference.
Also in the first set the CV clearly beats the pre-asph in the center WO, yet I think the reverse seems true indoors. Maybe I'm crazy LOL
I think maybe it shows how hard it is to do a perfect test with the M9, as the pre-asph might not have infinity calibrated for the distance of the first set.
I agree the Bokeh of pre-asph and CV is really close, pretty neat. One has to wonder how closely the pre-asph design was studied at cosina, and how the CV was formulated. Both lenses seem to have considerable copy variation.
Here is someone else adamant there is no focus shift with his CV 35/1.4 LOL
but then he retests and finds slight shift 😉
brbo
Well-known
Well, I can't see that. It seems pretty well focused wide open (hard to guess the exact in-focus point since it's a bit soft generally but I would hardly call it misfocused) and I definitely can't see focus shifting to the front @f2. It's evidently shifting to the back. You are probably looking at the wrong lens (Nokton is 3rd from left)?
2WK
Rangefinder User
I remember when I was buying my Nokton SC was reading reviews that all complained how the bokeh was distracting, nervous etc and nothing at all like the dreamy luscious smokey goo from a pre asph Summilux 😉
Lss
Well-known
Well, this was based on viewing the thread on an iPad. I now had a quick look at the full-size images, and the result of the Nokton is not exactly what I expected around f/4 to f/5.6. The detail in the bottom corner should get more into focus beyond f/2. This may be due, e.g., to alignment of the camera to the subject, so I wouldn't read too much into it.
If I recall correctly, you have a Sony A7R right? One way to see how much focus shift the Nokton exhibits would be to mount your Nokton 35/1.4 MC on it, mount the rig on a tripod, focus on something about 0.70 meters away, turn live view on, then starting at F1.4 stop the lens down gradually and see what happens. Even better, make a video, upload it somewhere, then link it here. My money is on the point of focus shifting noticeably backward as you stop down, but I'm happy to be proven wrong 🙂
Filzkoeter
stray animal
I also had no focus problems with my Nokton (MC), although the shift is existent.
I think there's sample variation between different Noktons and Jonmanjiros seems to be slightly backfocused wide open and shifts the focus even further to the back as it's stopped down.
I think there's sample variation between different Noktons and Jonmanjiros seems to be slightly backfocused wide open and shifts the focus even further to the back as it's stopped down.
Filzkoeter
stray animal
To show my thesis about Nokton sample variation. I did a quick test (on film) a couple of hours ago:
Nokton 35/1.4 on Leica M2, focused at 0.7m:
at 1m:
Mine is slightly front focusing at 1.4, focus starts shifting backwards at 2.0 and 2.8. Shifting seems to stop around 4.0
The depth of field covers the focused point on all apertures.
Also on film it seems much less critical then on digital.
Nokton 35/1.4 on Leica M2, focused at 0.7m:
at 1m:
Mine is slightly front focusing at 1.4, focus starts shifting backwards at 2.0 and 2.8. Shifting seems to stop around 4.0
The depth of field covers the focused point on all apertures.
Also on film it seems much less critical then on digital.
uhoh7
Veteran
Yes that's what I see, basically.
@jon yes I also have A7.mod and will check focus variation.
I've learned a number of interesting things in the past week from this thread and one at FM:
CV 35/1.4 is close knock off of pre-asph: i did not know that.
The lens has some focus shift, not huge usually but it exists. This will help alot in future use on M9.
Anyway I love your tests 🙂
Filzkoeter
stray animal
Looking at the Noktons lens diagram, it looks more similar to the old 8-element Summicron with some Summilux pre-asph genes thrown in 😎
leica M2 fan
Veteran
Thanks for this test Jon. I know I most likely will never own any of these lenses but I still love to receive the information on them and enjoy the photos.
rfaspen
[insert pithy phrase here]
Most 35/1.4 lenses are out of my usual budget too (especially the FLE). But, the CV lenses are an exception. This test showing the close similarity of the pre-asph and the Nokton makes me comfortable with the idea of getting one of those (the CV). I don't mind working "with" a lens when it remains an all-around good performer. I've had quite different experiences with other lenses over the years 🙂
I need to look and see how the new ZM 35/1.4 is priced relative to the pre-asph and noktons? Considering the similar behaviors we've seen between those two....wonder what the Zeiss lens is like. I mean, there is the Cosina factor here.
I need to look and see how the new ZM 35/1.4 is priced relative to the pre-asph and noktons? Considering the similar behaviors we've seen between those two....wonder what the Zeiss lens is like. I mean, there is the Cosina factor here.
Similar threads
