DougK
This space left blank
I'll second Scott. It would be helpful to have at least a target date thrown out there for planning purposes as I may have to farm out some medium format scanning.
NoTx said:Do you actually require full exposure info? If so, looks like I need to get away from a computer and back behind a camera... (need to anyways, but).
Gordon Coale said:A thought -- what about showing a picture of the camera that took the picture? The Classic Camera forum at photo.net had a contest with pictures from old cameras and also showed a picture of the camera that took the picture. It was great to see the cameras too. Just a thought. Maybe a good thought, maybe a bad thought.
Terence T said:A couple of quick questions before I get cracking on this.
- Would the panoramic image format using a Xpan be acceptable? I'm assuming an image in the portrait orientation would be acceptable subject to the 1200 pixel restriction but what if an image were to be taken in the regular landscape orientation? The size retstriction would make it look quite small.
- Digital format using a R-D1 acceptable?
Thanks!
Terence T said:A couple of quick questions before I get cracking on this.
- Would the panoramic image format using a Xpan be acceptable? I'm assuming an image in the portrait orientation would be acceptable subject to the 1200 pixel restriction but what if an image were to be taken in the regular landscape orientation? The size retstriction would make it look quite small.
- Digital format using a R-D1 acceptable?
Thanks!
saiseto said:oh..it's the pixel restriction is 2100 pixel on the long size of the photo?
by the way, I just wondering if Photoshop converted image acceptable??
pstevenin said:Is possible either to crop some image taken with an RF camera? (sometimes, I really do like square format cropped from a regular 24*36mm) and respecting the 2100/300DPI on the larger side? (ouarf ouarf...)
GeneW said:Camera, lens, film -- but not exposure info
For those who've not see Book 1, check out the preview version on Lulu:
http://www.lulu.com/items/volume_1/110000/110604/2/preview/RFFBook_preview.pdf
It shows what we had last time.
Gene
Terence T said:... but what if an image were to be taken in the regular landscape orientation? The size retstriction would make it look quite small.
The answer was to a question about shots taken with an XPan panoramic camera in which a landscape may end up something like 2100 pixels by 1000 pixels (or less) and would look quite small (for a pano). For normal 35mm shots, landscape is fine. Most of the images in book one are in landscape orientation.dmr said:Is portrait orientation a requirement or desirable?
Most of mine are landscape orientation? 🙁
Yes, you can purchase a copy from Lulu: http://www.lulu.com/content/110604ducttape said:Hey, that's pretty good! Is this book still available?
And, since we are on the subject... in one of the three threads on the subject I've read so far there is mention of an isbn number.
dcsang said:Just checking in...
Ralph, there are no limits to what CAN be photographed/submitted?
Just want to make sure before someone (or me) submits something that may be deemed "inappropriate".
Any themes or is this wide open (other than "it has to be shot with a rangefinder camera")
Dave