Announcing Book 2, Step 2 Time to get to work!

I'll second Scott. It would be helpful to have at least a target date thrown out there for planning purposes as I may have to farm out some medium format scanning.
 
NoTx said:
Do you actually require full exposure info? If so, looks like I need to get away from a computer and back behind a camera... (need to anyways, but).

No, camera, lens, and film is what we included in the first book. Fudge it if you have to, who will know?
 
Gordon Coale said:
A thought -- what about showing a picture of the camera that took the picture? The Classic Camera forum at photo.net had a contest with pictures from old cameras and also showed a picture of the camera that took the picture. It was great to see the cameras too. Just a thought. Maybe a good thought, maybe a bad thought.

Gordy, not a bad thought, but that would be another "thing" to collect from a lot of people to get the project completed. We actually did that, kind of, for the first book. We used the photos as the art on the back cover. This time around we have too many participants to pull that off.
 
Hi all,

Some more news,

I have to slightly apologize as I will have the list of participants completed soon, I am almost done, and I will send out a group email restating the submission info outlined on this thread. I just need to take the time to finish this up, then populate the rff.forum.com email address book. Luckily there are quite a few email addresses in there from the first book project and the Pass the Rangefinder correspondence.

I have not sent confirmation emails to everyone. I perhaps should have, but by and large the answer to the question is yes, you made the cut.
 
So, you want a deadline...

So, you want a deadline...

So, you want a deadline?

Please have all of your information, photographs, tech data, descriptions and bios prepared and submitted by

DECEMBER 31, 2005

We are assuming that preparing the photographs and laying out the book will take up to 2 months to complete after that date so please be prompt in your actions and provide us with your contribution as soon as possible.

We have started to receive photographs and stuff already, which is great. Keep up the good work.
 
A couple of quick questions before I get cracking on this.

  1. Would the panoramic image format using a Xpan be acceptable? I'm assuming an image in the portrait orientation would be acceptable subject to the 1200 pixel restriction but what if an image were to be taken in the regular landscape orientation? The size retstriction would make it look quite small.

  2. Digital format using a R-D1 acceptable?

Thanks!
 
Terence T said:
A couple of quick questions before I get cracking on this.

  1. Would the panoramic image format using a Xpan be acceptable? I'm assuming an image in the portrait orientation would be acceptable subject to the 1200 pixel restriction but what if an image were to be taken in the regular landscape orientation? The size retstriction would make it look quite small.

  2. Digital format using a R-D1 acceptable?

Thanks!


oh..it's the pixel restriction is 2100 pixel on the long size of the photo?

by the way, I just wondering if Photoshop converted image acceptable??
 
oh....i mean photoshop converted B&W image acceptable in my pervious question. 🙄
 
Is possible either to crop some image taken with an RF camera? (sometimes, I really do like square format cropped from a regular 24*36mm) and respecting the 2100/300DPI on the larger side? (ouarf ouarf...)
 
Terence T said:
A couple of quick questions before I get cracking on this.

  1. Would the panoramic image format using a Xpan be acceptable? I'm assuming an image in the portrait orientation would be acceptable subject to the 1200 pixel restriction but what if an image were to be taken in the regular landscape orientation? The size retstriction would make it look quite small.

  2. Digital format using a R-D1 acceptable?

Thanks!

Yes and Yes

Please send your question regarding landscape orientation to rff.forum@gmail.com so that Gene or Ray can answer it in contexts of how it will fit in the layout of the book. My opinion is that no, we will keep the portrait orientation of the page, the pano just has to comply with the 2100 pixels (7") length on the long side rule.

Xpan good
R-D1 good
 
saiseto said:
oh..it's the pixel restriction is 2100 pixel on the long size of the photo?

by the way, I just wondering if Photoshop converted image acceptable??


Yes, 2100 pixels on the long side.

Photoshop conversion from color to B&W is fine.
 
pstevenin said:
Is possible either to crop some image taken with an RF camera? (sometimes, I really do like square format cropped from a regular 24*36mm) and respecting the 2100/300DPI on the larger side? (ouarf ouarf...)

You are the artist, have at it.
 
GeneW said:
Camera, lens, film -- but not exposure info

For those who've not see Book 1, check out the preview version on Lulu:
http://www.lulu.com/items/volume_1/110000/110604/2/preview/RFFBook_preview.pdf

It shows what we had last time.

Gene

Hey, that's pretty good! Is this book still available?

And, since we are on the subject... in one of the three threads on the subject I've read so far there is mention of an isbn number.

Does anyone feel like taking on the task of getting this published for the rest of the world, and not just our coffee tables? Perhaps Abrams or another art book company, or maybe the photographers book people (is it Amherst? I forget the name) could pick up the reins after we're done and follow thru.

I did hear mention of distributing royalties. Send my check to me at... Seriously, and personally, I'm doing this not to make money as I know the book is for us. I assume everyone else feels the same (or else they wouldn't be offering their photos for a 'payment-free' endeavor). That said, perhaps any royalties could be donated to a charity, or a non-profit photo organization. That would solve that problem.

Is anyone in the publishing business? And, do the kind folk who started all this have objections (which, of course, should have been the first question asked. Apologies. I'm still working on morning coffee.)

David
 
Just checking in...
Ralph, there are no limits to what CAN be photographed/submitted?

Just want to make sure before someone (or me) submits something that may be deemed "inappropriate".

Any themes or is this wide open (other than "it has to be shot with a rangefinder camera")

Dave
 
dmr said:
Is portrait orientation a requirement or desirable?

Most of mine are landscape orientation? 🙁
The answer was to a question about shots taken with an XPan panoramic camera in which a landscape may end up something like 2100 pixels by 1000 pixels (or less) and would look quite small (for a pano). For normal 35mm shots, landscape is fine. Most of the images in book one are in landscape orientation.

Gene
 
ducttape said:
Hey, that's pretty good! Is this book still available?

And, since we are on the subject... in one of the three threads on the subject I've read so far there is mention of an isbn number.
Yes, you can purchase a copy from Lulu: http://www.lulu.com/content/110604

The issue of ISBN came up for discussion in book one (I was the one who raised it), and the consensus was that because there's an additional cost involved, and it adds no compelling benefits for our publications, we decided against adding an ISBN.

Gene
 
Well not to be a weenie anti-freedom of speech person (wow I can't believe I actually am in a situation to talk about this), um, yes there is a limit.

I will take the easy way out on this one. Somewhere in the rules of RFF there are rules about what images are inappropriate to display in the gallery. Those are the same rules for the book.

I am sure everyone will use discretion and show good taste in their submissions. Otherwise, I may be the only person to see them. 😉



dcsang said:
Just checking in...
Ralph, there are no limits to what CAN be photographed/submitted?

Just want to make sure before someone (or me) submits something that may be deemed "inappropriate".

Any themes or is this wide open (other than "it has to be shot with a rangefinder camera")

Dave
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom