Autocord Cures GAS

rover

Moderator
Staff member
Local time
3:05 PM
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
13,897
I may not need a Rolleiflex
6914037132_3741e9427c_z.jpg

I just got my first rolls back from processing. This is now my favorite Rokkor.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/roversworld/sets/72157629404086998/
 
What is that, a commercial iron? Or an instrument of torture?

I agree -- you don't "need" a Rolleiflex based on that. Nice cameras.
 
The late Al Kaplan was an Autocord fan and owner ... that's good enough for me!

Nice pic. :)
 
Everyone needs a rolleicord or 'flex. Come on, I know that, and you know it too!

No need at all for a 'cord since I have this Autocord. I will try to not look at any images from a 2.8 'flex though, I do have my weak moments.
 
For the tessaar-type lenses, the Rokkor is great. And the Autocord's design and ergonomics are wonderful. I recently used my Autocord on a project because I had fears about taking my Rolleiflex 2.8C into an environment, and I have no regrets. Smooth with just enough bite to make things stand out. As your shots show.
 
The thread title is wrong. If I had an Autocord, I still wouldn't have a Zuiko 50/1.2. Or 40/2. :p
 
I agree on the colour. Though I've no experience with the camera. I have a Flexaret that shares the same lens formula and focuing mechanism. But I really prefer the ergonimics of the Kalloflex (also Tessar formula).


Two tone Kallo by Eirik0304, on Flickr

But neither is a substitiute for a big 'flex. The feeling of quality and the results the Planar (or Xenotar) can attain are just something else.

So why do I still feel like I need an Autocord, a Ricohflex, a Walzflex, a ...flex?
 
Back
Top Bottom