I may not need a Rolleiflex
I just got my first rolls back from processing. This is now my favorite Rokkor.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/roversworld/sets/72157629404086998/

I just got my first rolls back from processing. This is now my favorite Rokkor.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/roversworld/sets/72157629404086998/
Lax Jought
Well-known
I've had GAS for one of these for a while now.
Would be funny if somebody came up with a digital back for it.
Would be funny if somebody came up with a digital back for it.
River Dog
Always looking
That is a weird looking camera 
Lax Jought
Well-known
hah!
7chars
7chars
ruby.monkey
Veteran
I'm not saying I don't believe you... but I don't believe you.I may not need a Rolleiflex
I'm not saying I don't believe you... but I don't believe you.
Ha!!!
The lack of funds will help me too.
KoNickon
Nick Merritt
What is that, a commercial iron? Or an instrument of torture?
I agree -- you don't "need" a Rolleiflex based on that. Nice cameras.
I agree -- you don't "need" a Rolleiflex based on that. Nice cameras.
FrankS
Registered User
Everyone needs a rolleicord or 'flex. Come on, I know that, and you know it too!
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
The late Al Kaplan was an Autocord fan and owner ... that's good enough for me!
Nice pic.
Nice pic.
What is that, a commercial iron? Or an instrument of torture?
I agree -- you don't "need" a Rolleiflex based on that. Nice cameras.
I bet it could hurt quite a bit.

Everyone needs a rolleicord or 'flex. Come on, I know that, and you know it too!
No need at all for a 'cord since I have this Autocord. I will try to not look at any images from a 2.8 'flex though, I do have my weak moments.
Dan Daniel
Well-known
For the tessaar-type lenses, the Rokkor is great. And the Autocord's design and ergonomics are wonderful. I recently used my Autocord on a project because I had fears about taking my Rolleiflex 2.8C into an environment, and I have no regrets. Smooth with just enough bite to make things stand out. As your shots show.
PMCC
Late adopter.
I will try to not look at any images from a 2.8 'flex though, I do have my weak moments.
Be advised, the Autocord is a known gateway camera to the Rolleiflex. It's a slippery slope.
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
The thread title is wrong. If I had an Autocord, I still wouldn't have a Zuiko 50/1.2. Or 40/2. 
MCTuomey
Veteran
Ezzie
E. D. Russell Roberts
I agree on the colour. Though I've no experience with the camera. I have a Flexaret that shares the same lens formula and focuing mechanism. But I really prefer the ergonimics of the Kalloflex (also Tessar formula).

Two tone Kallo by Eirik0304, on Flickr
But neither is a substitiute for a big 'flex. The feeling of quality and the results the Planar (or Xenotar) can attain are just something else.
So why do I still feel like I need an Autocord, a Ricohflex, a Walzflex, a ...flex?

Two tone Kallo by Eirik0304, on Flickr
But neither is a substitiute for a big 'flex. The feeling of quality and the results the Planar (or Xenotar) can attain are just something else.
So why do I still feel like I need an Autocord, a Ricohflex, a Walzflex, a ...flex?
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.