e-p2 coming 5th -EVF

250swb said:
Poor fool the person who didn't spot the EVF wasn't there on the EP-1 in the first place! What the heck do they expect if they can't read the spec sheet?

As for being kicked in the teeth by Olympus, I think this would be so if the camera refused to make any pictures after 5th November, and if the EP-2 was the same price bundled with the EVF. Otherwise the EP-1 still makes photographs, its just a brave person that is needed to admit they don't have the latest camera any more and sign off to the bragging rights to somebody else (so it may give them time to take photographs with their obsolete EP-1).

Steve
Click to expand...


Wow, and to think I was one of the few who was backing up the EP1 because it did not have a viewfinder and that is just the way cameras are now....bragging rights? With an EP1? Boy are you barking up the wrong tree.

The EP2 is a let down because Olympus has released a "me too" product to catch up with someone else and in the mean time they have totally missed the concept of the camera. That finder is huge, the camera's concept is small and portable high quality images. This finder really goes off that concept, not to mention the camera was made with a retro design and this finder obviously is not.
 
I agree the EP-2 is a miss, I don't feel bad for not waiting for it. The EVF hot shoe mount is a hack they threw on just to satisfy the critics. I think Olympus m43 designers are in a limbo now trying to figure out its role in the market. Is m43 a replacement for dSLRs, or is it just a slightly more versatile point-n-shoot? Mirror-less cameras will replace dSLRs. Next step is to get rid of the mechanical shutter, but that's another 5 years out at least. So, I'm in no hurry to upgrade my EP-1.

Olympus is still going to lose out on sales from the point-n-shooters looking to upgrade because the GF-1 has an EVF AND built in flash. I was talking to a guy today looking to upgrade from his Lumix FZ28. His biggest concern was getting 18x zoom like he has on the FZ28. I told him if he wanted the equivalent with a GF-1, he would have to wait another few months for the 100-300mm lens and fork up another $1K for it. He was surprised to find out that I bought the EP-1. I told him it has in body IS, better quality at high ISO, better JPEG compression, and a stereo mic (important for recording concerts). He said the stereo mic is cool, but no built in flash and EVF. I don't know if he realizes that built-in flash doesn't work at 18x zoom. The concept of in body IS doesn't apply to him because he doesn't have existing lenses to adapt and so far the Olympus lens choices are weak. Now if you want telephoto, you have to spend extra money on the OIS. All the techno babble about image quality at high ISO and JPEG compression totally blew past him. If it had a cellphone, bluetooth and GPS, then it's a win. I told him that Fuji, and Kodak are likely to jump into m43, with all of the other vendors doing their own equivalent mirror-less system next year. He was like oh? I'll stick with my FZ28 for now.

The Pen does appeal more to the art school fashionista crowd. I don't think an EVF or built-in flash will make much of a difference in their decision making process. If anything, the Pen competes with the Leica X1 as a lower cost alternative to the M9. The EVF makes the Pen look like a dorky tourist camera instead of a slick retro-cool chick magnet. I think the biggest concern fashionistas have now is "will my friends make fun of me behind my back for not buying a leica?".

I personally think the Pen looks better than a Leica, but I wouldn't roll down Bagdad highway on the back of tank with the Pen for fear that it will break (not that I ever roll down anything on the back of a tank).
 
count_zero said:
I personally think the Pen looks better than a Leica, but I wouldn't roll down Bagdad highway on the back of tank with the Pen for fear that it will break (not that I ever roll down anything on the back of a tank).
Click to expand...


I agree here, the Pen does look better then that Leica X1 which is just more reason why I am baffled why they made such an obviously lazy design on the finder. Seems they could have taken the swivel bit out and made it much smaller which would have appealed to more people I would think.

Oh and I have been on a highway on the back for a tank, though it was Sichuan province not Baghdad, I would hesitate about taking the EP1 with me on that trip (I took Canon DSLR equipment) but in the end I probably would take it anyway because it turns out on those trips, having a heavy camera really sucks because of the limited space, I ended up carrying almost everything on my lap for days.
 
Last edited:
I have to admit, not completely happy with this announcement. Even the black/silver/chrome on the body looks a little odd. Also looks like the only prime they have on their roadmap is a "wide" which will probably be slow. I want fast primes.
 
The EVF is, in my opinion, a nice addition, but the early reports suggest the AF would be more of the same, the LCD is still just 230k, plus it's quite pricey, so... I guess I'll be waiting yet again, but perhaps not for long! Ricoh's four thirds competitor is rumoured to be announced on the 10-12th of this month. And they know how to make a good small camera, but it's probably gonna be pricey since the GRD III is US$700...
 
fdigital said:
I have to admit, not completely happy with this announcement. Even the black/silver/chrome on the body looks a little odd. Also looks like the only prime they have on their roadmap is a "wide" which will probably be slow. I want fast primes.
Click to expand...


Where did you see that road map? I know that Panasonic is planning a 28mm equiv. f2.8 which also doesn't seem that appealing.
 
It doesn't appear Olympus made any changes to the two weak points of the EP-1, the woeful LCD screen and confused AF system (we won't talk about the control menues and dials). They also seem to be unwilling, as they are with their DSLRs, to offer prime lenses. The EP and GF cameras cry for small fast primes. The upcoming Pany 14/2.8 will be a good match for my 20/1.7. As for the zoom lenses, a user will be better served with a Canon Ti1 or any other small DSLR, or the Pany G cameras than the EP or GF series if you want to use a zoom. The EP and GF are different beast and should be supported as such.

As for the external VF. My bet is that most of the people who buy it for the EP or GF will stop using it within months of their purchase.
 
I think some of the disappointment in the direction these companies are taking is a misunderstanding of the target audience. While the micro 4/3 format has been usurped by the RF crowd to mount their old lenses, the primary target is the young, hip, Japanese consumer who is not primarily a photographer. These cameras push their buttons successfully.
 
Pickett Wilson said:
I think some of the disappointment in the direction these companies are taking is a misunderstanding of the target audience. While the micro 4/3 format has been usurped by the RF crowd to mount their old lenses, the primary target is the young, hip, Japanese consumer who is not primarily a photographer. These cameras push their buttons successfully.
Click to expand...

No confusion at all. I still think we are witnessing poor execution of this product line. In addition to selling this to generation Z both companies have expressed a commitment to making these two products parts of a system. Generation Z will not be buying past the body and kit zoom. To continue generating profits from these cameras the companies will need to sell lenses, to us. By 2011 when Oly gets around to putting out a wide lens most customers will already have their kits complete with Panasonic offerings. Not to mention the inevitable realization of the short attention span of this Generation Z target of theirs who in 6 months will be wooed away by a smaller sexier offering of some other company, which may or may not be better than a Pen, but just a better fit for this crowd.
 
I will say one thing about this announcement, though--and about the Olympus roadmap (which, take note, includes their OWN 7-14mm f/4!)--m4/3 is looking to me like a winning format that may be with us for a long time. I didn't go for it when the G1 first came out, mostly because the body didn't appeal to me, but partly because I wasn't sure about the viability of the platform. This disappointing Oly is, if nothing else, a sign of a desire to compete, and eventually this desire will have to force innovation. ESPECIALLY if Nikon and Ricoh get involved.

I wonder if Samsung is regretting not joining m4/3, rather than inaugurating their own mirrorless format.
 
I was really looking forward to this announcement, and I am thoroughly disappointed by it. When I heard that the EP2 was going to have an EVF, I (apparently unreasonably) assumed it would be built in to the camera. I love the concept of an EVF digital camera, I see them as potentially the modern equivalent of the original philosophy behind the Leica. Unfortunately, the execution is quite lacking on this camera. Basically, my (hopefully not incredibly unreasonable) go/no go checklist on purchasing a camera in the same vein as the EP2 is as follows- built in evf, slr style controls instead of point and shoot style controls, small form factor, and decent construction I would prefer APS-C, but in a camera that size, I would be willing to live with M43 if the rest of the camera had been right. The EP2 hits one and a half of those points, so I shall wait longer still. I waited 6 years before buying a digital point and shoot, and nearly a decade to buy a DSLR, so I am willing to be patient, but I really don't want to. Here is hoping Ricoh, Nikon, or Samsung hit more of the marks.
 
mabelsound said:
I will say one thing about this announcement, though--and about the Olympus roadmap (which, take note, includes their OWN 7-14mm f/4!)--m4/3 is looking to me like a winning format that may be with us for a long time.
Click to expand...

I think that's in reference to the 7-14mm they already have for Four-Thirds. The top part of the roadmap is for Four-Thirds, the bottom part is for Micro Four-Thirds. The upcoming lenses listed for Micro Four-Thirds, apart from the two announced, are a fisheye, a wide, a macro and a super telephoto zoom.
 
kywong said:
I think that's in reference to the 7-14mm they already have for Four-Thirds. The top part of the roadmap is for Four-Thirds, the bottom part is for Micro Four-Thirds. The upcoming lenses listed for Micro Four-Thirds, apart from the two announced, are a fisheye, a wide, a macro and a super telephoto zoom.
Click to expand...

Oh. Missed that. Not super exciting then...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
  • Article Article
The Pixii Max: The first real competitor to the Leica digital M’s!
3 4 5
Replies
99
Views
11K
Godfrey
Godfrey
J
  • Article Article
Coupled Rangefinder 35s and their Discontents: How to get the most out of these vintage classics.
2 3 4
Replies
72
Views
12K
lohrentz
lohrentz
J
  • Article Article
The Pentax Papers, Part 3, from the Super A of 1983 to the *ist of 2003: great shooters often overlooked.
Replies
11
Views
4K
ChrisPlatt
ChrisPlatt
J
  • Article Article
What Were They Thinking? A compendium of camera design blunders and omissions
2 3 4
Replies
73
Views
8K
chuckroast
C
J
35mm Still-Picture Photography: It began with scale focusing cameras! Back To Basics. Part 1, From the first to half-frame 35s of then and now.
Replies
10
Views
1K
Jason Schneider
J
Back
Top Bottom