gavinlg
Veteran
We've been able to buy compacts with physical controls and knobs for years. Look at a Canon G10, it has a shutter speed (correction: ISO) knob, exposure compensation knob and mode selector knob, plus another dial at the back for doing in-menu selections. That was two generations ago. If it was all about that, people wouldn't be as excited.
I think it's exactly the opposite and that it's all about the old-fashioned look. When the first pictures appeared, people were all about how sweet it looks. Now they ask questions such as what's the best bag to go with it. In a world where people buy things such as the ThinkGeek Bluetooth Retro Handset telephone receiver, "retro" is about appearance first, and about ergonomics a distant second.
There is no way to directly change the aperture and shutter speed simultaneously, or with no button presses, or without having to look at the LCD screen to see what number you have adjusted to, or when the camera is switched off, or when you're using the OVF with the G10. It's (at best) a bandaid solution to small camera ergonomics - which means in real world terms it's clumsy, slow and limited in comparison to an ergonomically good camera like a high level dslr or an m9.
The x100 will do all those things, plus it will crap all over the g10 in just about every place a camera should be good - IQ, high ISO, dof control, build, ergonomics, lens speed, responsiveness, OVF usability etc.
If you can't see that from here I can't help you!
Last edited: