NicoM
Well-known
Both the M7 and MP sell for the same price new, but the M7 sells for so much less in the used market. I don't get the huge prece difference. Am I missing something?
Both the M7 and MP sell for the same price new, but the M7 sells for so much less in the used market. I don't get the huge prece difference. Am I missing something?
Eh? How is a battery-dependent M7 'more useful' than a non-battery-dependent MP? It's better if you like to rely on AE, but many don't, and it's hard to think of any other advantage. And have you any evidence that 'people buy film Leicas today mainly for collecting'? I can think of ONE person I know who buys new Leicas 'for collecting' , but then, he has scores, probably hundreds, of Leicas old and new. Every other Leica owner I know uses their camera(s), especially the ones they buy new -- and I've known a lot of Leica owners since I started using them in 1969.Since an M7 is a much more useful camera than the MP, the second hand price is lower, because people buy film Leicas today mainly for collecting, no for using.
In other words, M7s are bought by people who want the snob appeal of a Leica, but don't care to take full control themselves,
Cheers,
R.
And what a bizzare generalisation from someone like yourself!M7s are bought by people who want the snob appeal of a Leica, but don't care to take full control themselves, while MPs are bought by people who really know and care about what they're doing ...
Many Leica lovers prefer classic all mech cameras. I think its a roots thing for some of us as well.
Are there more used M7 on the used market? Could be the reason.
Since an M7 is a much more useful camera than the MP, the second hand price is lower, because people buy film Leicas today mainly for collecting, no for using.
You can make most parts for a mechanical camera. Try making a circuit board...