They are afraid of scratching the paint.
If you see this camera on Ebay in a few years, grab it. Get the tape and residue off, the finish will be perfect.
I thought the a la carte option was the relic look that Fender applies / subjects to new guitars making them appear old. For the M9 it would be the Jim Marshall brassing effect. Tape, we don't need no estinkin' tape....
"He explained that since the M9 isn’t suited for humid and tropical environments (he said he had been shooting in Hong Kong for the past month) it was necessary to tape up the body like this to keep the moisture out. That, and the more it looks like a beat up old vintage camera (and not a state of the art $10,000 digital Leica rig), the better for shooting out on the streets."
Oh, heavens help us...for once, I have no idea how to respond to that one, Dave.hehe.. that site kills me.. specifically this recent image:
http://tokyocamerastyle.com/post/1063617560/ginza-three-leica-mps-and-a-nikon-sp-taken
Not because of the image but because of the caption.. 😀 😀 😀 😀
Dave
never seen the point in protecting digital cameras like that as in about five years time they will not be worth that much even if the paint work is perfect.
Depends on the camera, I guess.
Fuji F30s are still selling for 150 EUR over here, which, after almost five years, is like 60% of what they cost when they were available new.
Epson R-D1s still sell for 1500 to 2000 USD (see e.g. 180542689576 on eBay), which is 50-60% of what they cost new six years ago. Only now are they starting to drop, as M8s trickle down into the used market. Not bad at all in my book!