Thomas78
Well-known
Simply love the compactness of the 5cm f3.5 LTM elmar...my friend called it "pocket rocket"...so compact on a LTM Barnack you can easily put in the your pocket and it can be extended out like a rocket launcher...![]()
That is true!
Right now I have have a Canon P with the large Canon 50 / 1.2 in a SLR camera back. The remaining one third of the space ist just enough to get a Zorki I with a Industar 22 (FSU Elmar copy) inside. It is a nice day & night set in a small camera bag.
Marc-A.
I Shoot Film
I've had a bunch of Leica M 50, but kept one and only one 50: the glorious Summitar.

Bingley
Veteran
I succumbed and bought another Summitar (thanks Huub!), a glorious uncoated sample from 1939. This one is a keeper.

Putah Creek by bingley0522, on Flickr

Boulevard Park by bingley0522, on Flickr
Still have the Elmar 50/3.5, though. That's a keeper, too.

Putah Creek by bingley0522, on Flickr

Boulevard Park by bingley0522, on Flickr
Still have the Elmar 50/3.5, though. That's a keeper, too.
kdemas
Enjoy Life.
Bingley said:I succumbed and bought another Summitar (thanks Huub!), a glorious uncoated sample from 1939. This one is a keeper.
Putah Creek by bingley0522, on Flickr
Boulevard Park by bingley0522, on Flickr
Still have the Elmar 50/3.5, though. That's a keeper, too.
Very nice Steve! Terrific lens. I'm popping mine up for sale tonight as I just don't use it much but you and others certainly show what can be done with this neat hunk of glass.
kdemas
Enjoy Life.
Here's one from my M8 & Summitar 50/2.0. Some tweaking in Lightroom.
Smoke.
Smoke.

HuubL
hunter-gatherer
I succumbed and bought another Summitar (thanks Huub!), a glorious uncoated sample from 1939. This one is a keeper.
Putah Creek by bingley0522, on Flickr
Boulevard Park by bingley0522, on Flickr
Still have the Elmar 50/3.5, though. That's a keeper, too.
Great to see that you put the lens to good use Steve! Excellent images of this uncoated Summitar. I'm glad you like it.
helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
MPerson; said:Beautiful image Helen - gateway to Hades!
I love my 1959 Elmar 50/2.8 mated with the M2. Here with APX 100:
Just saw this ...THANKS MUCH MPerson for your Kind Comment-Hades Indeed
LOVE your shot of Him drinking soda pop ...Wonderful Candid !!
**********************************
Thomas78
Well-known
yossarian123
Sam I Am
I have a bunch of shots that I posted with my summitar.
Except they're posted in the classifieds (where I happen to be selling a copy of this fine lens)...just in case anyone gets a case of GAS looking at these shots.
(sorry for the shameless plug)
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/pho...ca-coated-50mm-summitar-and-accessories/cat/2
And in terms of raw character, I prefer my uncoated nickel elmar:
Except they're posted in the classifieds (where I happen to be selling a copy of this fine lens)...just in case anyone gets a case of GAS looking at these shots.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/pho...ca-coated-50mm-summitar-and-accessories/cat/2
And in terms of raw character, I prefer my uncoated nickel elmar:

Thomas78
Well-known
Thank you for this nice image!
Bingley
Veteran
Yossarian, that is a beautiful photo!
Bingley
Veteran
So, at the risk of re-posting photos too many times, I offer this comparison of a scene at the UC Davis Arboretum that I've come to enjoy.
First, with a coated Elmar 50/3.5 from 1947:

March 4, 2012 by bingley0522, on Flickr
And then an uncoated Summitar from 1939:

April 14, 2012 by bingley0522, on Flickr
First, with a coated Elmar 50/3.5 from 1947:

March 4, 2012 by bingley0522, on Flickr
And then an uncoated Summitar from 1939:

April 14, 2012 by bingley0522, on Flickr
colyn
ישו משיח
Both lens are fine but image quality is slightly better with the Summitar.
I use both..
I use both..
Monochrom
Well-known
Guess the poll will be win by the summitar by far....but i voted on the elmar..it´s smaller and sharper at 3.5 as the summitar...
It´s the 2nd most pocketable lens ever.
The first place would go for the 3.5cm elmar....which is the most pocketable lens ever, also always ready to shoot!!!
It´s the 2nd most pocketable lens ever.
The first place would go for the 3.5cm elmar....which is the most pocketable lens ever, also always ready to shoot!!!
Bingley
Veteran
You know, at the end of the day they're both wonderful lenses, if you get good samples and learn their limitations. I've seen fabulous photos from each lens, both here on RFF and over on flickr.
hexiplex
Well-known
I love my Summitar, I lost a bid on an Elmar the day before I purchased it, but yeah, I think if I won that auction and got an Elmar instead, I'd be equally thrilled with that. The most glaring con of the Summitar is that is so prone to flare, and that the hood to remedy it makes the lens pretty useless in terms of pocketability. I can correct the flare easily with scanned negatives, but I find getting a decent print much more of a challenge.
Dralowid
Michael
mretina
Well-known
Elmar 50/3.5 LTM

Tel Aviv, Elmar 50 f3.5 di mraposio, su Flickr
Shot @3.5

Elmar 50mm f3.5 LTM di mraposio, su Flickr

Elmar 50mm f3.5 LTM di mraposio, su Flickr

Tel Aviv, Elmar 50 f3.5 di mraposio, su Flickr
Shot @3.5

Elmar 50mm f3.5 LTM di mraposio, su Flickr

Elmar 50mm f3.5 LTM di mraposio, su Flickr
mretina
Well-known
summitar

Festa di fine anno, Summitar di mraposio, su Flickr

Festa di fine anno, Summitar 50mm f2 LTM di mraposio, su Flickr

Festa di fine anno, Summitar di mraposio, su Flickr

Festa di fine anno, Summitar di mraposio, su Flickr

Festa di fine anno, Summitar 50mm f2 LTM di mraposio, su Flickr

Festa di fine anno, Summitar di mraposio, su Flickr
Vics
Veteran
And really, an Elmar doesn't need to be coated......
I notice that Erwin Puts agrees with you.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.