Hi,
Uh? Paying for two cameras and getting one isn't a steep premium? Not to mention that, compatible lens system aside, the 5D Mk III does about 300% of what the M 240 does, and does most of it better.
I'm not saying that makes the 5D a better photographic tool, but the modern Leica markup, compared to other cameras which do more and are as durable, is extreme.
If doing 300% of what the M 240 does, still does not make the 5D a better photographic tool, what's the point?
We are talking about cameras, right? I'd be happy to pay double for a photographic tool that makes my life happier by being easier to use, works better and is smaller and lighter considering it's hanging around my neck all day and night. Not to mention that related equipment like lenses are smaller, lighter and better at making photographs.
I'm not seeing the logic in these types of arguments. It seems that many people are upset with Leica because the M costs $7000.00 rather than because it's a poor camera or product. No one is forcing anyone to buy one. If you don't like the price, don't buy it. I don't blame you, I don't like the price either. I'm not angry about it though and I still want one.
If price is the main argument maybe an XA is a better tool than a Canon 5D since it's clearly less expensive and can take pictures just like the 5D? Many people, myself included, have said that buying a Leica (or other expensive camera system) will not make you a better photographer. Buying the cheapest camera will also not make you a better photographer. However, in my opinion, a more complex and less ergonomic tool might get in the way to becoming one (whether it's expensive or not (which is relative)).
What happens if my Leica M (Typ 240) is damaged due to loose eyelets?
If your camera and/or lens were damaged due to this fault we will replace them free of charge.
Can't ask for much more than this ... there doesn't seem a lot to argue about here!
I was thinking the same thing. The company is acknowledging the error and is taking full responsibilities for the consequences. What's the problem? Leica is NEVER supposed to make mistakes because their equipment is so expensive? That's impossible.
Back when I was shooting movie stills, I was outside and the sun burned some holes in the shutter. The camera was still under the 3 year warranty and I sent it in. It came back repaired at no charge. Was I supposed to be upset that the shutter is not fire-proof? They fixed it and they are fixing this. Who on this thread that is crying so much has an M 240 and is sending it in for repair? If you do not own an M 240 and are not sending anything in for repair, what are you complaining about?
So I wonder ... if your Leica and Noct plunges eathward and lands on your Nikon D4, will they replace that as well? 😀
Sure. Why not. The Nikon broke the fall and saved the Leica and lens from further damage.
I've had my camera knocked from a table onto a concrete floor more than once, been kicked and banged into at concerts and clubs, etc. Nothing ever broke except the lens hood once got partially crushed and bent in front of the 35mm.
Since the hood is made of aluminum, I bent it back out of the way and kept shooting. Focus was fine, no little AF motors to break or knock out of alignment, camera body is metal and functioned perfectly to get me through the assignment.
Good luck trying that with a 5D.
