dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
Wintoid - regarding "shutter lag" - I personally don't see any - and that's with the M lens mounted and manual focusing turned on. It's really a no brainer - and IF there's any shutter lag, it's going to be a "tough" call to make because, unless you're used to something that is absolutely instant, EVERY camera has some shutter lag - this camera is no different, imho, than my M7's or any other M I've used. Your mileage may vary in this aspect however - try it out, if you can, and see.. I'm sure it's not as bad as others have claimed or as others may have been led to believe. 
Ben - I don't have any ultra wides - the widest I have is the Zeiss 25mm (sharp bugger too
) - I just shot four quick photos and have uploaded them to Flickr as an example for anyone looking to see "smearing" at various f stops - f2.8 through to f8 at ISO800 are shown. I personally don't not much "smear creep" on this lens. I do not have the CV 15mm anymore but may be able to borrow one to shoot with it to see... regardless, as you said, if you're shooting wide open, there's very little to smear and as I have said, it really depends on the end user and how/if they feel that the corners are an issue for them. IF the X-Pro1 were a full frame camera, this "smearing" may be more evident (at least that's my theory anyway) but as of right now, I'm freaking happy with the results of the M lenses on the camera. The 25mm is as close as i can currently get to a "35mm" field of view (that being about 37-38mm I guess due to cropping).
I just wonder what Fuji will do when they release their adapter - that is, what will be 'different' about it compared to this Kipon third party adapter.
Cheers,
Dave
Ben - I don't have any ultra wides - the widest I have is the Zeiss 25mm (sharp bugger too
I just wonder what Fuji will do when they release their adapter - that is, what will be 'different' about it compared to this Kipon third party adapter.
Cheers,
Dave
dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
For those that don't want to go to my Flickr - here's some results at 800px -
Cheers,
Dave
- f2.8
- f4
- f5.6
- f8
Cheers,
Dave
Benjamin Marks
Veteran
Now that is interesting Dave. With the 25, I can definitely see "something" going on in the lower corners of the image at f:2.8. But I had to look at the "original size" image on flickr to see it. The issue seems considerably resolved by f:8. So I guess the question is: does it matter? For me: no. I don't think that the corner issue identified is likely to pose a problem for my photography. Thanks for posting those.
Ben
Ben
bobby_novatron
Photon Collector
dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
hehe.. how can you NOT love Bronze Elvis
Dave
Dave
bobby_novatron
Photon Collector
Glad you liked it, Dave. 
Thanks again for posting your test shots and reporting back with your X-Pro1 experiences ... there's many of us here (myself included) that are very interested in jumping in and purchasing this particular camera. Your feedback has been very valuable.
Thanks again for posting your test shots and reporting back with your X-Pro1 experiences ... there's many of us here (myself included) that are very interested in jumping in and purchasing this particular camera. Your feedback has been very valuable.
dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
Glad you liked it, Dave.
Thanks again for posting your test shots and reporting back with your X-Pro1 experiences ... there's many of us here (myself included) that are very interested in jumping in and purchasing this particular camera. Your feedback has been very valuable.
You're welcome
I just dropped a couple more up there using "outdoor"/"real world" samples.
Cheers,
Dave
bobby_novatron
Photon Collector
BTW, an announcement for Canadians:
When I checked the Vistek website last night, there were a few X-Pro1's available in Canada ... Toronto and Ottawa locations, I think. Just a couple clicks away, and you can buy one through the website.
For those of us outside of those two cities, I think shipping is pretty simple.
When I checked the Vistek website last night, there were a few X-Pro1's available in Canada ... Toronto and Ottawa locations, I think. Just a couple clicks away, and you can buy one through the website.
For those of us outside of those two cities, I think shipping is pretty simple.
N
Nikon Bob
Guest
Our local camera store has one or two also, so they are out there now in Canada.
Bob
Bob
JHutchins
Well-known
Now that is interesting Dave. With the 25, I can definitely see "something" going on in the lower corners of the image at f:2.8. But I had to look at the "original size" image on flickr to see it. The issue seems considerably resolved by f:8. So I guess the question is: does it matter? For me: no. I don't think that the corner issue identified is likely to pose a problem for my photography. Thanks for posting those.
Ben
I'm not sure I can see anything going on there that I didn't also see going on when I used that lens on my M8. I haven't tried it on my Fuji yet as the lens is loaned out, but I will at some point soon. I can tell you that I've used a 50 summicron DR and seen absolutely nothing that is inconsistent with that lens's performance on my M8. Which would be unsurprsing except that the test pictures everyone's talking about (vines against the stone wall) made the 50 lux look bad as well.
And at this point I'm still a bit of a smearing skeptic. I agree that the corners in those viney wall shots looked terrible, but I really couldn't get a sense from them of how much of that terrible was wind blur (some of it unquestionably is) how much of it is due to a focus point that seems a bit in front of the wall and in the viney area, how much of it is due to the camera being canted so the sensor isn't parallel to the wall &c. I've just not seen much using wide M lenses other than those photos where the corners are even potentialy in the plane of sharp focus; and those wall photos are a bit problematic.
Spyro
Well-known
Noctilux, via fujix forum
http://www.flickr.com/photos/micheledesilvestro/7045329383/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/micheledesilvestro/7045329383/in/photostream
Steveh
Well-known
Has anyone tried any of the SLR adapters? I'm tempted by the Kipon OM adapter so I can uses my Zuikos on the X-Pro. Would using retrofocus SLR wideangles be a better solution to avoid smearing etc. than rangefinder lenses? Thoughts appreciated as I'm a legacy lens novice!
Spyro
Well-known
Would using retrofocus SLR wideangles be a better solution to avoid smearing etc. than rangefinder lenses?
Probably, but still under investigation
It looks like it depends on each individual lens design.
chris00nj
Young Luddite
bruceh
Member
jskjsk
Established
What are your setting for using Leica lens?
I can't seem to get any metering or any other control. More or less shot and adjust / repeat to find the right setting.
I can't seem to get any metering or any other control. More or less shot and adjust / repeat to find the right setting.
Jamie Pillers
Skeptic
In the hand, its quite another matter. I held one a couple of days ago and it 'falls to hand' perfectly. Great balance, light weight, the best viewfinder I've looked through in ages... feels like a no-frills photo machine ready to rumble! 
jskjsk
Established
Only workable shot I could get out of using 50 lux. After 20 frames of unusable.

What are your setting for using Leica lens?
I can't seem to get any metering or any other control. More or less shot and adjust / repeat to find the right setting.
Aperture priority, shoot without lens, set ISO, focus, shoot...
jskjsk
Established
Aperture priority, shoot without lens, set ISO, focus, shoot...
Are you getting accurate metering from what you see on EVF?
My issues are:
- no metering indication (I see the metering bar but nothing moving)
- what ever I see on EVF does not come close to picture taken.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.