EA4BL
Member
Lumix 20mm 1:1.7 and rarely Canon FDn 50mm 1:1.4 (Pen E-P1)
I agree with you , I have the 14-42 II wich I used exclusively as mft lens since 2010 on Oly E-PL1 . I think it will survive in my bag because :I understand that you asked about primes, which is why I mentioned the macro. But partly my point is that the Zuiko zooms are excellent, even the inexpensive ones.
Aren't the 17and the 20 too close ? I am hesitating about the 17 thinking it's a bit close to the 25 and not wide enough.How do you feel about it?My most used is the Oly 17/1.8; before I got that lens last year, it would have been the little Oly 17/2.8. 17mm and my Olympus Pen F is turning into a nice combination for me.
After 17mm, I use the Oly 45/1.8 and the Lumix 20/1.7 I. The latter is still a superb optic, although the AF is not up to the more recent Olympus MFT primes.
I've got the Oly 25/1.8 and the Lumix 14/2.5, but I don't use them nearly as much as the other focal lengths.
For a digital kit for travel, the Pen F with the 17/1.8 and the 45/1.8 is just about perfect.
I agree with you , I have the 14-42 II wich I used exclusively as mft lens since 2010 on Oly E-PL1 .
Which are your most used (preferred) native mft primes ?
I just started the primes collection very traditionally , with a 50 equivalent "normal " (Oly 25/1,8) wich came today ...
I find I use the 15mm f/8 lens a lot. It's the only wide for mft that actually covers the format and allows close focus, or focus-free use as desired. I know this is usually seen as more of a toy lens, but I've taken some great shots with it.