plummerl
Well-known
Ok, so I finally succumbed to near fatal GAS, and scooped up a M6 (classic) from KEH (via EPREY) (it’s not quite fatal, I have a 50mm f2 Summicron arriving tomorrow). This M6 turns out to be one of the last 100 built (by S. Gandy’s serial number list), built in late June of ’98 and I cannot find a mark on the body. I had the speeds checked out and they appear to be within tolerance. The only issue is with the framelines.
I have CV 15mm, 25mm and 35mm with a 35/135 M adapter. With the 35 mounted, everything looks great. Using the preview lever, the 50/75 frames look great. When I preview the 28/90 framelines (see attached digitals (sorry!)) there are remnants of the 50/75 framelines showing.
As it turns out, I was the only bidder on the camera and it appears that I picked it up for roughly $200 less than what it goes for on the KEH website. I emailed DAG (including the aforementioned photos) for his opinion, and he replied that it would be a fairly simple repair for $85. I figure that I could have him assess the camera at the same time.
My dilemma is that after talking to KEH about what I found, they said no problem. Return the camera immediately, they would pull another one out of the warehouse, check it out and send it to me on receipt of the one I had. This would potentially yield a camera that could be much older (M6 was from 86 to 98) but not have the issue. After holding this pristine M6 in my hands, I think I am going to send it off to DAG for a quick assessment and hopefully repair. If it is found to be a true LEMON (what’s the chance of that???) I can still deal with KEH on a return.
Opinions?????
larry
I have CV 15mm, 25mm and 35mm with a 35/135 M adapter. With the 35 mounted, everything looks great. Using the preview lever, the 50/75 frames look great. When I preview the 28/90 framelines (see attached digitals (sorry!)) there are remnants of the 50/75 framelines showing.
As it turns out, I was the only bidder on the camera and it appears that I picked it up for roughly $200 less than what it goes for on the KEH website. I emailed DAG (including the aforementioned photos) for his opinion, and he replied that it would be a fairly simple repair for $85. I figure that I could have him assess the camera at the same time.
My dilemma is that after talking to KEH about what I found, they said no problem. Return the camera immediately, they would pull another one out of the warehouse, check it out and send it to me on receipt of the one I had. This would potentially yield a camera that could be much older (M6 was from 86 to 98) but not have the issue. After holding this pristine M6 in my hands, I think I am going to send it off to DAG for a quick assessment and hopefully repair. If it is found to be a true LEMON (what’s the chance of that???) I can still deal with KEH on a return.
Opinions?????
larry