Richard G
Veteran
It's a win for M9 owners. M10 at Photokina now? I really don't care. MONOCHROM? Great for those that want it. Priced more or a little less than M9 really makes no difference.
Well, the test images look very crisp, the tonality is very nice, but I still want to see some dynamic range figures. It better be an improvement over the performance of the M9, which is a little weak at 7-9 stops. I'm hoping for 12-14 stops.
But in any case at $7950 it's mute point. I would need two bodies and I'm no banker.
Guess I'll just keep feeding my six analog M bodies more Tri-X...
In Canada the price of the M9-M will be 1000$ more than the M9, 300$ more than the M9-P... I don't understand. Why didn't Leica made a digital Leica at the price range of a Leica CL that could only shoot black and white? That would have been something nice for students like me! Now they made a camera for weird fetishists...
Nikon and Canon can make full frames for a way lower price... Why build a Black and White only digital if it is going to cost more to make it than a colour one? These are not jewellery, these are tools. These should be made to be brought to Syria and Afghanistan with those who could profit from a tank camera built to highest standards and whatsoever. I love rangefinders. All I can afford is a Leica M2 or a CLE... or Voigtlander. Obviously these are not digital.because there is probably no way to build it at that cost.
I still can't believe that the APO Cron 50 will Cost $7195! That's more than three times the cost of the previous Cron 50 ,,,
In Canada the price of the M9-M will be 1000$ more than the M9, 300$ more than the M9-P... I don't understand. Why didn't Leica made a digital Leica at the price range of a Leica CL that could only shoot black and white? That would have been something nice for students like me! Now they made a camera for weird fetishists...
Nikon and Canon can make full frames for a way lower price... Why build a Black and White only digital if it is going to cost more to make it than a colour one? These are not jewellery, these are tools. These should be made to be brought to Syria and Afghanistan with those who could profit from a tank camera built to highest standards and whatsoever. I love rangefinders. All I can afford is a Leica M2 or a CLE... or Voigtlander. Obviously these are not digital.
I won't be able to use them in my photography classes, which are a full time 3 years program by the way...
You've got 6!? Mail me one please. Thanks..
Leica expects the young like you to work hard, have a profession, earn money, get a permit-of-purchase from your wife or gf, then until you accomplish these prepare yourself to pay a car's price for a body and again a car's price for two of your favorite lenses to own a small kit digital Leica of the year. Leica always wants the young to accomplish even more than what their parents wish them to do.
Then I hope Voigtlander will exploit this market or something... Just stick a nice sensor in a R2M and I'll be happy...I agree that the costs are scary but NIKON and CANON do not build full frame rangefinders! There is a reason for this - rangefnder and hand building every lens, piece of glass, etc. The cheapest digital rangefinder ever made was the Epson RD1 and it was at close to $3k when it as discontinued. I am sure you know that Epson no longer makes that camera and probably the true cost of building it and supporting it were too much for them.
Leica expects the young like you to work hard, have a profession, earn money, get a permit-of-purchase from your wife or gf, then until you accomplish these prepare yourself to pay a car's price for a body and again a car's price for two of your favorite lenses to own a small kit digital Leica of the year. Leica always wants the young to accomplish even more than what their parents wish them to do.
Well, the test images look very crisp, the tonality is very nice, but I still want to see some dynamic range figures. It better be an improvement over the performance of the M9, which is a little weak at 7-9 stops. I'm hoping for 12-14 stops.
But in any case at $7950 it's mute point. I would need two bodies and I'm no banker.
Guess I'll just keep feeding my six analog M bodies more Tri-X...
I'd be interested in one, but I'd love to see a side-by-side comparison of image quality from it with a black and white image from a regular M9. If the difference is that dramatic (and particularly at high ISO), then I might make the switch. Need to get my D800e first though!
So tilted pictures of cats and the backs of strangers heads will now be only in black and white, and purportedly sharper.