New Leica M digital Monochrome camera announced

It's a win for M9 owners. M10 at Photokina now? I really don't care. MONOCHROM? Great for those that want it. Priced more or a little less than M9 really makes no difference.
 
Well, the test images look very crisp, the tonality is very nice, but I still want to see some dynamic range figures. It better be an improvement over the performance of the M9, which is a little weak at 7-9 stops. I'm hoping for 12-14 stops.

But in any case at $7950 it's mute point. I would need two bodies and I'm no banker.

Guess I'll just keep feeding my six analog M bodies more Tri-X...

You've got 6!? Mail me one please. Thanks..

Seriously though they've priced this one a bit high even for them.
 
I still can't believe that the APO Cron 50 will Cost $7195! That's more than three times the cost of the previous Cron 50 ,,,
 
In Canada the price of the M9-M will be 1000$ more than the M9, 300$ more than the M9-P... I don't understand. Why didn't Leica made a digital Leica at the price range of a Leica CL that could only shoot black and white? That would have been something nice for students like me! Now they made a camera for weird fetishists...

because there is probably no way to build it at that cost.
 
because there is probably no way to build it at that cost.
Nikon and Canon can make full frames for a way lower price... Why build a Black and White only digital if it is going to cost more to make it than a colour one? These are not jewellery, these are tools. These should be made to be brought to Syria and Afghanistan with those who could profit from a tank camera built to highest standards and whatsoever. I love rangefinders. All I can afford is a Leica M2 or a CLE... or Voigtlander. Obviously these are not digital.
I won't be able to use them in my photography classes, which are a full time 3 years program by the way...
 
BOBYIL wrote:Here the white clouds with shades of light gray on a blue sky background have been demonstrated; you noted the "muddy" tones of clouds on the digital sample as being the first discrepancy in rendering. If you try the same for yellow fields (harvest scenery) and the ones toward red the differences in rendering would again be obvious. With red tones like brick walls there is more tendency with digital to "darken" as the red-band sensitivity of sensors shows a "falling" character compared to mid-band colors.

I will try to examine the pictures of the new M9M, to see if Leica was able to accomplish some substantial modification on the response curves in that thread. This is the heart of the issue with the digital B&W and I am sure in the meantime the owners of the M9 or M9P's will check their own results against them. What they would state would be more insightful."

Exactly and this may hold the key to Harry's 12-14 stops of exposure latitude
OC
 
I can't help but somehow feel like Leica thinks I'm nuts or something... Seriously. I can't believe I'm saying this, but I'm not longer in Leica's target market.
 
In Canada the price of the M9-M will be 1000$ more than the M9, 300$ more than the M9-P... I don't understand. Why didn't Leica made a digital Leica at the price range of a Leica CL that could only shoot black and white? That would have been something nice for students like me! Now they made a camera for weird fetishists...

Leica expects the young like you to work hard, have a profession, earn money, get a permit-of-purchase from your wife or gf, then until you accomplish these prepare yourself to pay a car's price for a body and again a car's price for two of your favorite lenses to own a small kit digital Leica of the year. Leica always wants the young to accomplish even more than what their parents wish them to do.
 
Nikon and Canon can make full frames for a way lower price... Why build a Black and White only digital if it is going to cost more to make it than a colour one? These are not jewellery, these are tools. These should be made to be brought to Syria and Afghanistan with those who could profit from a tank camera built to highest standards and whatsoever. I love rangefinders. All I can afford is a Leica M2 or a CLE... or Voigtlander. Obviously these are not digital.
I won't be able to use them in my photography classes, which are a full time 3 years program by the way...

I agree that the costs are scary but NIKON and CANON do not build full frame rangefinders! There is a reason for this - rangefnder and hand building every lens, piece of glass, etc. The cheapest digital rangefinder ever made was the Epson RD1 and it was at close to $3k when it as discontinued. I am sure you know that Epson no longer makes that camera and probably the true cost of building it and supporting it were too much for them.
 
You've got 6!? Mail me one please. Thanks..

Backup bodies and recently one of them died for good...

I've been shooting for a long time and picked up three of them about 10 years ago, when everyone thought that film was going to disappear overnight and were dumping their gear at insane prices.
 
Leica expects the young like you to work hard, have a profession, earn money, get a permit-of-purchase from your wife or gf, then until you accomplish these prepare yourself to pay a car's price for a body and again a car's price for two of your favorite lenses to own a small kit digital Leica of the year. Leica always wants the young to accomplish even more than what their parents wish them to do.

At this price I don't even call it accomplishment, I call it suicide...
 
I agree that the costs are scary but NIKON and CANON do not build full frame rangefinders! There is a reason for this - rangefnder and hand building every lens, piece of glass, etc. The cheapest digital rangefinder ever made was the Epson RD1 and it was at close to $3k when it as discontinued. I am sure you know that Epson no longer makes that camera and probably the true cost of building it and supporting it were too much for them.
Then I hope Voigtlander will exploit this market or something... Just stick a nice sensor in a R2M and I'll be happy...
 
Leica expects the young like you to work hard, have a profession, earn money, get a permit-of-purchase from your wife or gf, then until you accomplish these prepare yourself to pay a car's price for a body and again a car's price for two of your favorite lenses to own a small kit digital Leica of the year. Leica always wants the young to accomplish even more than what their parents wish them to do.

I bought my first Leica and lens almost 15 years ago. These items were purchased new from a dealer and while they were not cheap, they did not amount to the cost of a Honda Civic...
 
Well, the test images look very crisp, the tonality is very nice, but I still want to see some dynamic range figures. It better be an improvement over the performance of the M9, which is a little weak at 7-9 stops. I'm hoping for 12-14 stops.

But in any case at $7950 it's mute point. I would need two bodies and I'm no banker.

Guess I'll just keep feeding my six analog M bodies more Tri-X...


In practice it may have less DR than the M9, or similar. However, the sample images look very sharp and detailed. The picture of Notre Dame has ugly tonality, but Silver efex will probably fix that. What Silver efex will not fix is the inability to replicate film chromatic response (not really possible with a Bayer array either), and so filters will look different, just as they do between different films (anyone tried a deep red on Adox CHS25:))

Mike
 
I would really like to buy one just to support Leica for doing this. I probably won't, but I'm pleased it exists.

I'll have to see if my local dealer gets a demo I can borrow for a weekend.

Mike
 
I'd be interested in one, but I'd love to see a side-by-side comparison of image quality from it with a black and white image from a regular M9. If the difference is that dramatic (and particularly at high ISO), then I might make the switch. Need to get my D800e first though!
 
I'd be interested in one, but I'd love to see a side-by-side comparison of image quality from it with a black and white image from a regular M9. If the difference is that dramatic (and particularly at high ISO), then I might make the switch. Need to get my D800e first though!

Subscribe to ReidReviews.com - the comparison is worth the look.
 
Back
Top Bottom