There was also some sort of comparison of Scanmate 11000 and Scanmate 5000 earlier. It seemed that at least the Scanmate 5000 picture was not properly focused.
So here is an example, of the sharpness in Scanmate 5000 after i manually adjusted the focus via "Focus Elevation":
This is just a drymounted 35mm neg. No sharpening. It's not about the content of the picture, it's about the sharpness of the grain.
And just for the sake of comparison, here is the same frame scanned with Flextight Precission 2 @ 6300dpi. It takes almost 15min to do a 6300dpi scan from 35mm negative. It only took about 6min to do the 5000dpi scan on Scanmate 5000. This was unexpected, drumscanner is actually faster! If you don't wet mount, it's actually pretty fast to do scans. I have not still cleaned the optics on this, and both B&W scans could be even more sharper, if i would scan them as RGB and use only the green channel. The flextight scan was also much more flat, i boosted the contrast to make them about the same.
But Flextight P2 is clearly sharper at this point.
Here is a screenshot, to give you hope for running this on Win7x64, so you don't need extra computers & old operating systems:
I'm running this via Adaptec AIC-7870 PCI, it's not supported in Win7.. but there was some sort of way around it (google and you will find it). I use also my Flextight P2 via it in Win7x64.
At the moment, it seems the largest file size i can get out of this is 500mb. This is weird, i assume i should get at least 1gb? Could this be an effect of running this on 64bit system?