Some questions about my first lens (ELMAR 5cm)

Are you out shooting tomorrow? I'll be in Stuttgart for a little bit (Mannheim -> Ulm) and I'll sure walk around a little. I won't be online though, just give me a call if you feel like it.

martin
 
Last edited:
Just for an update:

The lens arrived yesterday an looks very clean. After removing some dust from the front lens, the glass is really clear and the focussing goes so smooth . . . 🙂

I was looking: the serial number has 7digits and the numbers for the depth of field are painted red. what does this tell me? does anyone know?

That means it's a Red Scale Elmar, which is kind of rare and normally cost more than what you paid 😉 Congratulation.
 
Last edited:
Congrats on the lens. It looks good! Just a warning note: if you want that M2 in the nice cosmetic state as it is now, you want to remove those metal fasteners on the strap. They seem to be pretty sharp edged and will scratch the sides of the top cover above the lugs in no time.
 
The Red Scale is the last and best optical derivation Elmar3.5. It is more than red numbers. It is typical of late 1940/1955 lenses that have a smooth but sharp appearance. I attribute it to the lack of ability to resolve very fine details.

If you like the lens, get a 3.5 Summaron 35 mm and 90 4.0 screw mount Elmar. They have similar imaging if they are clean.

Some MMM waterproof clear tape will protect the camera from strap marks which they will surely make the first time you use it. They are vicious.

Many consider the M2 one of the best Leicas ever made.
 
Congrats on the lens. It looks good! Just a warning note: if you want that M2 in the nice cosmetic state as it is now, you want to remove those metal fasteners on the strap. They seem to be pretty sharp edged and will scratch the sides of the top cover above the lugs in no time.

Don't know if it is a common problem, but I turned down buying one M2 at the last minute when I saw both the strap lugs were just about worn completely through, so I would agree, you want some sort of strap that babies those lugs. I also understand they are taken off from the inside, so not your average DIY project. I think my user M2 also has brassing from the straps just rubbing on the chrome. Some people use tape, but you need to use the right tape. I guess you could tape over all your cameras and cars as well. ;-)


Congrats to the OP for a very nice find, when I hear Soft Coatings I get very protective, especially when I accidentally removed a soft coating from an enlarger lens with "lens cleaner", (Isopropanol, anhydrous). Guess I am a bit paranoid, but I also have a good friend who manages not only to put up with me, but to CLA my lenses. ;-)

Sounds as if you are going to get even more enjoyment with the hood and adapter thrown in.

Am going to have to report those photos as downright Leica Porn. ;-)

Regards, John

Regards, John
 
To protect the body, Dymo tape is good.

Cheers,

R.[/quote]

Roger,

Have used electrical tape as recommended by my dealer on the M8, but is the Dymo a good bet in terms of 1. sticking in hot weather 2. any damage to the finish 3. easy removal

I suppose you have the added benefit of writing something as well. Have not seen much Dymo tape as of late.

If I can find a dymo writer for French it might help my language skills. ;-)

I remember taking the chrome off an old Chevy with masking tape, but perhaps the tape was stronger, and chrome weaker.

This body looks so nice I might even cut the rings off rather than even risk splitting and winding them off. Those snaps have to go right now.

Am thinking the Leica Strap in Germany might cost half the price of the lens. ;-)

Regards, John
 
Nice package with the red scale Elmar (for those truly into Leica trivia - there are TWO versions of the red scale - arrowhead distance mark and the Diamond shaped one - no other differences though as to coating etc). This version was later made into a M-mount version with slightly easier f-stop control - but optically the same. I always have found the M-mount 50f3.5 slightly better than the f2.8 M-version.
The Elmar is a classic lens, not complicated, 4 element - but Leica made several 100 000's of them and really got it right with the red scale version. You have to look long and hard even among modern lenses to find something significantly better.
The hood is good as they can flare badly in strong light. You will soon figure out how to change aperture without putting your finger on the front element too!
Summer is here (or coming) so for now - just shoot with the M2 and the 50f3.5 and enjoy the "ride". Once fall arrives and light is in short supply, you can start thinking of a faster lens - or just learn how to handhold the M2 at slow speeds. Brassai, HCB and several other photographic greats used the Elmar 50f3.5 as their main 50mm lens - and did very well with it.
 
Ok, it is Saturday and I feel mellow and Roger has a couple of M2's already. Probably doesn't want to sing it's praises to loud - could increase prices in case he wants a third one! I am not worried, back to 14 so I am set - even if I would live for an extremely long time!
Tom
 
Ok, it is Saturday and I feel mellow and Roger has a couple of M2's already. Probably doesn't want to sing it's praises to loud - could increase prices in case he wants a third one! I am not worried, back to 14 so I am set - even if I would live for an extremely long time!
Tom


Am so glad you avoided the unlucky number 13. ;-) I do hear yours get more exercise though. We also have a mutual friend who would find you another or two if you want to climb out of your "teens".

My shop drop shipped me one, with a few lenses, because they remembered I wanted one, and as it was, I hate to use the word, but they called it, "scruffy", I could not complain about the price. They did not want it in their stock. ;-) Do you have at least one very "experienced" M2? Mine had been CLA'd and a set of M4 frames installed.

The OP's camera looks very clean.

J
 
Last edited:
John. all of mine are experienced, some more than other! One M2 I bought in 1964 and the black top plate has been replaced twice. It had an attraction to car doors that was positively unhealthy! The other ones range from good users to "i should really send it away for a CLA, but it still works" condition.
 
Tom,

I recall it was Max Teakey who said "There is no such thing as a scruffy Leica"

I have lost track of Max, hope I did not mangle his name, and he is doing well.

He shot a long time with LTM before finally buying an M mount.

I do hear from a friend that you move a bit of film through your cameras. ;-)

Did you replace the body lugs? I was amazed at the ones I saw on the M2 I was taking to Jorge in Mexico, one pull and they would have split. Camera was overall very good otherwise, I had overlooked the lugs until the last minute and swapped the camera for one from Igor. Was this a design problem, or just the odd case?

I must admit to babying Leicas more than the SLR's I bought, which I expected to mark up normally, then sell them as users when I traded up.


I realize that the cameras were meant to be used, and really, M bodies are almost always repairable, actually at often fairly reasonable prices.

It was Jorge's M4 that survived the 20 foot fall, in a case, landing on the CV 50. Camera got a few frequent flier miles, but it got fixed, and the lens was reassembled as well leaving a few scratches on the rim.

If the camera gets roughed up in the line of duty, it is just part of its life. It does cost if you plan on trading it in.

From what I can see, the OP's is very good cosmetically.

John
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom