FrozenInTime
Well-known
I often wish I'd never bought any digital cameras; imaging instead spending $15k on retaining the services of a world class darkroom B&W print maker.
This one I can certainly get behind.I often wish I'd never bought any digital cameras; imaging instead spending $15k on retaining the services of a world class darkroom B&W print maker.
The reality is that the printer itself is probably within reach, even though it may be a stretch for most of us. What we do not always think of is what it takes to keep that printer running and the time, practice and supplies it takes to become good really good with it.What sort of A3 printer could I buy for $15000?
Oh alright, call it $6000, and I'll throw in an M11 body to make up the difference.
Yep. Ink and paper will be an expense. I do want one (a printer) though. I do want to start printing some of my images now that I have at least some competency with photography! (apparently)The reality is that the printer itself is probably within reach, even though it may be a stretch for most of us. What we do not always think of is what it takes to keep that printer running and the time, practice and supplies it takes to become good really good with it.
Enough to start your museum...I'm wondering how many different box cameras I can get for $15K...
Ahh, the Alpa! I think I'll add that to my list, for exactly the same reason!I think I could stretch that out to cover...
1) A CLA'd Widelux F7,
2} A light weight 5X7 field camera with a good semi-wide lens
3) A Kodak Professional 8X10 contact printer (for above)
4) A thorough CLA on my Leica I
5} A fully working Alpa 9D with 50 Macro-Switar - just for the hell of it
All the remainder for film - as I'd now be shooting 5X7.
That or a wrist mounted TessinaAhh, the Alpa! I think I'll add that to my list, for exactly the same reason!
M2 is the finest Leica M film camera for a 35mm lens ever, IMHO. One certainly doesn’t need anything more ….I’ve never had a fund. I don’t save. Many of our pictures and even our wonderful curved TV were bought precisely when we lacked the funds. I wondered about the brilliant (viewfinder) Leica MA: but I already have it, only better, the M2. I need nothing more.
hmm. Lessee: $15K is a Leica M11 and two Leica lenses, one if you pick one of the more expensive Leica lenses, purchased new. Not a huge boondoggle ... I'm sure lots of people on RFF have a new Leica M and a couple of new Leica lenses in their camera bags.I have always been a bit of a gear head. And if there is any saving grace to middle age it is that I am now pretty comfortable with that fact. My thin rationalization is that different kinds of cameras and lenses have encouraged me to see differently. So I just frame things differently with, say, a 4x5 camera on a tripod then I do with a Barnack.
This morning's musing: suppose you were suddenly gifted with $15,000 US that you had to spend on photographic "stuff"? Yeah, it is the first-iest of first first-world problems. How would you spend it RFF if the wealthy, eccentric uncle who left it to you stipulated that it had to be spent on something photographic?
I know some of you wouldn't buy a single piece of gear, but would buy an airplane ticket to somewhere you've always wanted to photograph.
Others would buy a collector's Leica that has always been just out of reach.
Still others might hire a professional model and rent a studio for a day.
Others might purchase an entire new camera system.
Others might purchase 15 $1,000 cameras and distribute them to promising kids.
Or take a class, or purchase a Sebastiao Salgado print, or augment their library of photo books.
Personally, and being comfortably the gear-head I maintain I am, I would plump for one of the digi-Hasselblads.
Feel free to critique the question too. Maybe I am fantasizing on two small a scale. Make it $50,000 and take a year off. Or make it $100,000 and build the portrait studio you always wanted. I think a modest 25x25 skylit structure with nice large northern exposure would suit me just fine.
So whaddaya think RFF?