Takkun
Ian M.
The 'visual impact is more important than gear' made me think about images I'd shot in years past, ones that can't be recreated, and how I'd change my technical approach. In particular, a number of poor choices of lenses, film, and what have you.
Two situations come to mind:
First is a wedding I shot years and years ago, where I shot part film, part digital. Had a zoom on each, at the ready, for any situation necessary. In retrospect, I wish I had skipped the digital, and just kept with primes. I got all the requisite shots, but I never liked the look of the zoom lenses, and wish I had the confidence to forgo them.
Another was more recent; this last summer, when I took up serious architectural work, I kept with HP5 for about 20 rolls. I've been shooting it for nearly a decade, and always loved it for photographing people and urban grit, but photographing architectural details in the summer sun wasn't a good combination.
Two situations come to mind:
First is a wedding I shot years and years ago, where I shot part film, part digital. Had a zoom on each, at the ready, for any situation necessary. In retrospect, I wish I had skipped the digital, and just kept with primes. I got all the requisite shots, but I never liked the look of the zoom lenses, and wish I had the confidence to forgo them.
Another was more recent; this last summer, when I took up serious architectural work, I kept with HP5 for about 20 rolls. I've been shooting it for nearly a decade, and always loved it for photographing people and urban grit, but photographing architectural details in the summer sun wasn't a good combination.