peterm1
Veteran
On the spur of the moment (is there any other way to buy camera gear??) I bought the early "fat" version of the Tele Elmarit M 90mm f2.8. It dates to 1969 and I also have the later "thin" version from the mid 1970s. I am a bit of a fan of larger lenses for some reason and always thought that the thin version looks a bit skinny when mounted on an M camera. It does a good enough job though provided you are careful to avoid flare - I read somewhere that the thin lens barrel precluded better baffling to stop random flares and perhaps this is the reason for this issue. Never the less its a good lens and so far the fat version is shaping up well too. I must admit to loving the look. The following photo is not of mine - its a generic shot from the internet to give you the idea. BTW when I got mine the lens barrel had quite a few bright spots and for this reason I guess its price was quite good. But these spots touch up exceedingly well by using a proprietary aluminium black bought from gun stores. Camera afficionados should know this trick if they are fastidious.
BTW Perhaps because of my longer lens obsession I now have several Leica 90s - the fat Tele Elmarit (black); the thin Tele Elmarit (black), the Elmarit (chrome) and the Summicron (black Canadian). Plus of course the venerable 90mm Elmar f4 in LTM. Fun times.
BTW Perhaps because of my longer lens obsession I now have several Leica 90s - the fat Tele Elmarit (black); the thin Tele Elmarit (black), the Elmarit (chrome) and the Summicron (black Canadian). Plus of course the venerable 90mm Elmar f4 in LTM. Fun times.

