What is your favorite camera setup for vacation?

GaryLH

Veteran
Local time
9:43 AM
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
6,141
What camera and/or lenses to bring always seems to come up for discussion one way or another. I thought it would be nice to consolidate some of these thoughts in a single thread..

As I get older, my days of carrying around a big d/slr or medium format or larger camera are long gone. So my ideas of the perfect setup are most likely different then yours. In general, I don't tend to shoot w/ prime lenses (3 or more). I don't want to make friends and family wait on me..no only am I spoiling their vacation, but vacation is the time to enjoy time w/ your friends and family not glue to the back of a camera. Don't get me wrong, when I was younger, I definitely been there and done that.

My options for for vacation....
- Panasonic LX100 plus Ricoh GR
- Fuji XT1 w/ 18-135 WR and eventually the 35f2 WR plus Rioch GR

A vacation that involves water sports like snorkeling, the GR could be replaced w/ a Sony p&s that is waterproof to 10m. The Fuji setup if I end up on a vacation that may have rain in the forecast or I know I need the zoom range of 27-200 fov.

If I go on vacation to someplace like Yosemite I would bring the Fuji xt1 and most likely Sigma DP0 for panoramic shot.

I have taken the Panasonic lx100 plus the Rioch GR the last two vacations. To me it is a near perfect setup.. I can put everything I want to carry everyday in a small sling bag including my kindle page white or I can out the GR in my front jean pants pocket, the kindle in my back and the lx100 hangs around my shoulder..

For me, the lx100 w/ the 24-75fov f1.7-2.8 zoom ends up the primary camera. Though I rarely shoot video at home...on vacation I will shoot it when I think it would be better, especially getting 8mp pics from 4K video.

For most cases, the 24-75 zoom range meets probably 80-90% of my needs. While digital zoom is really nothing more than cropping, the iResolution which try's to fill in the missing pixels and two different ways of digital zoom..which when combined gives u a 4x zoom factor. Granted it is nowhere as good as a good zoom like the 55-200 Fuji, but it does an adequate job. Good enough for the vacation snap shots. From the 24-75, I have been able to print up to 13x19 and have been very happy w/ the results.

Not only is the GR the perfect backup camera for vacation but one could also argue that in its own right, it could be a good vacation camera. Having 28 native fov, 35 and 47 crop fov plus the optional 21 fov attachment makes it a great city vacation camera just by itself.

Both these cameras are close enough to normal p&s, that I can hand them to a stranger and ask them to take a picture of my wife and I. The lx100 has a dumb mode (iA button) that disables a lot of function and puts it in a real do everything p&s mode.

As u can c the lx100 plus GR for me makes the near perfect vacation setup..followed by the xt1. I plan to bring the lx100 plus GR on my trip to Japan next year.

So how about u?

Gary
 
Last edited:
Leica M2 + Summaron 2.8 + 25/2.8ZM, Fuji GF670, Ricoh GXR with the 28mm or a Ricoh GRD4 🙂

And we all kid ourselves that we want to travel light (camera gear that is)
 
My son and I went to Europe for two weeks this summer.

I took my EM5 with 3 lenses and a Panasonic LX-5.

Had a blast! Used the kit 14-42R lens the most, it's sharp and tiny.

Don
 
On vacation this year, I had the XE1, 18mm & 27mm. Worked out fine - I hate carrying gear when I am cafe hoping, training, ferrying, shopping, etc.
I never carried both lenses ... just picked one lens for the day.
The X100 would have worked out just as well.
 
A couple of weeks ago while vacationing in southern Arizona and Mexico I took a Horizon 202 and Fuji GS645s. Two weeks and I shot 5 rolls 120 Acros and 2 rolls 35 Acros. I'm afraid I'm really selective in what I shoot.

When in Italy last time I took my old Canon G10.

Images from vacation are mainly for memories. I look at vacation as a vacation not an assignment. I get plenty of assignments the rest of the year.

I find if I drag a lot of gear it just gets in the way of enjoying time with my wife and seeing the sights.
 
I've long ago abandoned the goal of traveling light for certain trips. If it's a once-in-a-lifetime trip to a destination that I may never visit again, I would rather bring everything including the kitchen sink than miss a perfect shot because I compromised on which lens to pack.

Destination also decides which lenses I to pack, e.g., my 200-500mm would be useful in a photo safari in Tanzania but not so much (at least for my style) in a typical European capital.

For general big-city holidays, my options are (note that while I pack them for the trip, I don't necessarily carry all of them each day while on vacation. I may only carry one or two lenses on any given day):

Option 1: D800e, Sigma 35/1.4 ART, Sigma 50/1.4 ART, Nikon 85/1.8 AFS and Nikon 20/1.8 (but soon to be replaced with Sigma 24/1.4 ART).

Option 2: Sony A7R (modified with thin sensor and converted to full spectrum IR), ZM 25/2.8, ZM 35/2.8, ZM 50/2.0 and CV 9/3.5. Plus ZI body and several rolls of 400 speed B&W film.
 
I use two Pentax P3n (they are compact and light) cameras, and a 28mm and a 50mm. So, one color and one B&W body and two lenses to switch. I also take a 6x6 folder with TriX ( a couple rolls or more) and I'm fine.
 
I don't really know if they class as 'vacations' but for my last two big trips (10 days backcountry in Sweden's Sarek National Park, and an 18 day north-south traverse of Iceland) I only took a GR, and felt pretty happy with the results 🙂
 
I've long ago abandoned the goal of traveling light for certain trips. If it's a once-in-a-lifetime trip to a destination that I may never visit again, I would rather bring everything including the kitchen sink than miss a perfect shot because I compromised on which lens to pack.

Destination also decides which lenses I to pack, e.g., my 200-500mm would be useful in a photo safari in Tanzania but not so much (at least for my style) in a typical European capital.

For general big-city holidays, my options are (note that while I pack them for the trip, I don't necessarily carry all of them each day while on vacation. I may only carry one or two lenses on any given day):

Option 1: D800e, Sigma 35/1.4 ART, Sigma 50/1.4 ART, Nikon 85/1.8 AFS and Nikon 20/1.8 (but soon to be replaced with Sigma 24/1.4 ART).

Option 2: Sony A7R (modified with thin sensor and converted to full spectrum IR), ZM 25/2.8, ZM 35/2.8, ZM 50/2.0 and CV 9/3.5. Plus ZI body and several rolls of 400 speed B&W film.

Lol... I've taken the perverbial kitchen sink when I was young (junior at college), I went backpacking in Yosemite w/ a baby linhof (the 3 match lenses and two backs) plus a slr and two lenses.

Btw. Thin sensor..was that the kolar conversion. U had them do both the ir and thin at the same time?

Gary
 
Btw. Thin sensor..was that the kolar conversion. U had them do both the ir and thin at the same time?

Gary

It's a new service from Kolari - combined thin filter mod AND full spectrum IR conversion for $399 (same price as the thin filter mod). I just got the body today. It wasn't available their website last week. I had to request via email, and they had to send me a Paypal invoice. Not sure if they've updated their website yet. Of course, I had to order a hot mirror filter to be able to take 'normal' photos and a 590nm filter ('goldie') to complement an 850nm filter that I already have.
 
Cool.. I am waiting for a7mk3 to ship (at rate Sony comes out w/ new cameras..I'll only have to wait about a year), I can pick up a mk2 for under 1000.. I think I'll have the kolari mod done then to my mk1.

Gary
 
I procrastinated for a long time re: getting the Kolari mod, but in the end, I decided that I like the tactile feel of manually focusing adapted lenses versus the superior sharp images of the 55/1.8 FE. Sounds weird I know, to prefer the tactile experience over superior IQ, but it works for me.
 
I think it gets down to good enough (the thread started by Bill Pierce) as much as anything. If pictures u are getting are good enough for your needs and u prefer the rf lens experience, then why not.

Gary
 
Like kxl above, I don't try to travel small and light, as my goal is good pics at the best quality I can manage. I want the limiting factor to be my own faults... 🙂

The tactic for us is to go shopping and go exploring, fortunately both offering photo opportunities. I'm sure different folks have different priorities.

I used to pack a Pentax 67II and a couple lenses, as I'll go big but I don't take a lot of stuff. A year ago it was a Leica M240 with 75mm and M8 with 25mm. The Leica S2 went with me to Arizona a few years ago, and to San Diego last summer with 100mm and 35mm. I'll take it this month to Hawaii with just the 70mm. Yes, it's a bit bulky with the grip attached but smaller than the big Pentax. The technical quality of the results is very satisfying, so no whining!

I recall that trip to Puerto Rico some years back with two Contax G2 bodies and three lenses in the bag, just about ruined both shoulders the day we wandered around Old San Juan. Too much stuff! Since then the bag stays in the car trunk.
 
Back
Top Bottom