Nachkebia
Well-known
My widest in use is 25mm because I don`t need external viewfinder to compose, I hate to use 21mm with external viewfinder, waiting for R4 to use 21mm, also waiting for 18 biogon 
thafred
silver addict
Joe...I agree with doug (excellent rendition of your G-lens btw!!)...I think 15 basicaly is too wide for Street in general but could lead to some very interesting compositions for particular subjects.
It takes a totaly different approach to do street when shooting 21mm or shorter but can be a rewarding experience (when I do this I leave the 40 at home so I´m not tempted to use it) and it can even look "not Ultrawide" with the 21 at least...with the 15 i´m not sure if you can mask the UW factor but work with it instead wich will be chalenging at least.
one of my recent shots were I think the 21 behaves very humane:
It takes a totaly different approach to do street when shooting 21mm or shorter but can be a rewarding experience (when I do this I leave the 40 at home so I´m not tempted to use it) and it can even look "not Ultrawide" with the 21 at least...with the 15 i´m not sure if you can mask the UW factor but work with it instead wich will be chalenging at least.
one of my recent shots were I think the 21 behaves very humane:

oscroft
Veteran
My widest is a CV 15, and the reason that's my widest is because I don't have the money for a 12
But seriously, I also have a CV 21, and that gets far more use than the 15. The 15 is fun, and I really like it, but the occasions when it's useful are quite rare. For walking around and general street shooting, I think a 21 would be far more useful than a 15. I also think the difference between a 25 and a 21 is significant (I don't have a CV 25 - one is on it's way - but I have Zuiko 24 and 21 lenses for OM SLRs and to me there is an appreciable difference between them).
But seriously, I also have a CV 21, and that gets far more use than the 15. The 15 is fun, and I really like it, but the occasions when it's useful are quite rare. For walking around and general street shooting, I think a 21 would be far more useful than a 15. I also think the difference between a 25 and a 21 is significant (I don't have a CV 25 - one is on it's way - but I have Zuiko 24 and 21 lenses for OM SLRs and to me there is an appreciable difference between them).
Mine is the CV21, plenty wide for me. It captures what I see, peripheral vision included, so it is especially intimate in my eyes. You need to compose with a foreground element, and you have to be CLOSE to your subject. And watch your fingers, I have lots of shots with them in the frame. That is the only think I dislike about the little CV 21. I now have the rectangular hood for it, it will keep my fingers out of view.
IF, CV introduces a faster coupled 25 I would consider it, but only for the speed, I don't know though, we will have to see.
IF, CV introduces a faster coupled 25 I would consider it, but only for the speed, I don't know though, we will have to see.
Last edited:
Pherdinand
the snow must go on
A seventeen, but it's an SLR. But that should not matter. No, it's a full frame film slr
so it's wicked wide. But i use the 24mm much more often. Let's face it...With a 17mm you have to be careful with people in your frame.
What do you mean "why"?
What do you mean "why"?
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
The widest lens I own is a 28mm Ultron ... if I need anything wider I'll step backwards ... space allowing of course! 
Pherdinand
the snow must go on
By the way I don;'t know how close the ultrawide RF lenses can focus, but if it's the same limitation like for wide and normal lenses, it would make no sense *to me* to have a really wide in rf mount. With the slr 17mm i can focus to 15 cm wide open, and if i stop it down a lot, basically i can get sharp images of stuff at the distance of the fixed hood.
I use the superwide mostly for the perspeective, the strong foreground-background expansion, so it is crucial that i can focus CLOSE. I rarely need a 17mm to "fit the subject in" where i could not take a few steps back, as Keith wrote.
I use the superwide mostly for the perspeective, the strong foreground-background expansion, so it is crucial that i can focus CLOSE. I rarely need a 17mm to "fit the subject in" where i could not take a few steps back, as Keith wrote.
Nachkebia
Well-known
that is the only thing I hate in rangefinders, close focus....
Sparrow
Veteran
12mm, always attracted to extremes……. And I picked it up and it just stuck to my hand whispering resistance is useless; as usual
Sparrow
Veteran
Nachkebia said:that is the only thing I hate in rangefinders, close focus....
Are you sure that’s all?????
:angel:
Nachkebia
Well-known
Price? well yeah 
Sonnar2
Well-known
My widest is the 15mm, my first LTM lens, but I use the 21mm more often. 21mm is excellent combined with a 35mm. I also had the 25, but it's too close to the 35 and to far away from 15mm.
markinlondon
Elmar user
Although I own two 24mm lenses for SLR's I haven't used them for about three years. My widest lens is a 35mm.
nemjo
Avatar Challenge
My widest is a 15 CV bought for a Bessa R.
I liked it very much. Prefocus and then can use the external viewfinder alone...
As I changed to RD1, it's not so wide - but still very convenient to use with the 21mm finder.
Very compact, well built - and nice...
nemjo
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=5128
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=6495
I liked it very much. Prefocus and then can use the external viewfinder alone...
As I changed to RD1, it's not so wide - but still very convenient to use with the 21mm finder.
Very compact, well built - and nice...
nemjo
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=5128
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=6495
Last edited:
ferider
Veteran
Couple of 15 "street shots" .... highly addictive focal length - but when you look at the photos after a while they feel not so special, in particular when people are in the photos; they get highly distorted.


oscroft
Veteran
Ha, that's nothing - with the CV 15 I've managed to get my nose in the frame!And watch your fingers, I have lots of shots with them in the frame. That is the only think I dislike about the little CV 21
santino
FSU gear head
15mm Heliar, just love weird angles.
Jeroen
Well-known
A 20/3.8 Cosina in Nikon F-mount. I got it for free when I bought my 55/2.8 micro but have grown quite fond of its huge field of view. I'm definitely a wide angle shooter, I rarely go beyond 100 mm. I'm saving up for a Nikkor 20/2.8 AFD or even a Tokina 17/3.5 right now - the latter would be a great companion for my D70S.
K
Kin Lau
Guest
Ferider, great shot of Sienna. That really is a great use of the 15mm.
I only had a 28mm when visiting Italy last time, and it definitely wasn't wide enough.
I only had a 28mm when visiting Italy last time, and it definitely wasn't wide enough.
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
Roland, that second image gives me vertigo! It's a cool shot, but wow it makes me dizzy to look at it!

Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.