If only one prime, then 35 equiv.
If only one prime, then 35 equiv.
Raid, first my personal greetings! Hope to see you again in the NE one of these days.
I just faced the same dilemma. Trip to Peru, including famous Inca sights and Inca/Spanish towns. Outdoors, high-altitude bright scenes mixed with interior shots. At Machu Picchu, I wanted high image quality. I had to travel light.
Here's what I took:
- Sony crop body (the A6000, a terrific camera)
- For low light and for highest quality images, Zeiss 24mm (35 equiv) f/1.8 prime
- For bright light more casual shots the tiny slow Sony mid range zoom.
I was very pleased with the results. The consumer zooms from all the manufacturers are quite good these days in good light. And the Zeiss performed perfectly. At Machu Picchu, the 35 equiv viewpoint was fine for most shots I wanted. A 50 would have been too tight. If a few places, 35 wasn't wide enough. So, I stepped back or found another shot.
The 35 viewpoint, to me, is the one if I'm taking only one prime lens. Yes,
for us, that's traveling light!
Here's a sample, the classic overview from the "guard house". I know I could have shot it wider, but I'm happy with this.