Turtle
Veteran
I can only comment on the CV 21 and 25mm P lenses, but similar points hold true for the 35mm Pancake II:
There are epic variations in lens assembly. There are more decentered copies that perfect ones, by far. These differences can be obvious or almost invisible on film, but on a M digital (FF), they are unmissable. My 35mm Pancake is perfect on film. I cannot see ANY decentering, but I cannot miss it on the Monochrom (softer right side).
Neither perform as well in the outer margins as their Zeiss ZM or Leica equivalents. My 21mm f2.8 Zeiss is a cracker on the MM and trounces the CV 21mm P in the outer field and corners, but the CV has the charm of imperfection. BTW this 21P is perfectly centered (second copy) and so there is a natural and equal fall off in resolution towards the edges.
If you can find a 21mm or 25mm CV lens that can resolve as well across the frame as a ZM/Leica on a Leica FF digital M, you have done very well indeed. Then there are the colour shifts, which dont matter on the MM of course.
There are epic variations in lens assembly. There are more decentered copies that perfect ones, by far. These differences can be obvious or almost invisible on film, but on a M digital (FF), they are unmissable. My 35mm Pancake is perfect on film. I cannot see ANY decentering, but I cannot miss it on the Monochrom (softer right side).
Neither perform as well in the outer margins as their Zeiss ZM or Leica equivalents. My 21mm f2.8 Zeiss is a cracker on the MM and trounces the CV 21mm P in the outer field and corners, but the CV has the charm of imperfection. BTW this 21P is perfectly centered (second copy) and so there is a natural and equal fall off in resolution towards the edges.
If you can find a 21mm or 25mm CV lens that can resolve as well across the frame as a ZM/Leica on a Leica FF digital M, you have done very well indeed. Then there are the colour shifts, which dont matter on the MM of course.