Kodak Duaflex III, pulled from my static collection, cleaned up, minor refurb and put back into active duty. Rerolled Plus-X 120 onto 620 spindles, film developed in Adonal (Rodinal). Love to hear what you think.
Well done for what I recall as a difficult place to photograph. (I was there eight years ago.) I found it difficult to get the colored windows and any interior features well exposed at the same time under available light. And the place is too large to fill-flash with any equipment you could be carrying. (I think I might recall flash was banned anyway.) Plus it's hard to compose as the space is maddeningly tall but narrow. I wished I had the CV 12 mm lens or similar. --Dave
One of the real challenges at Ste. Chapelle is the crowds in the room - it is hard to compose a shot that doesn't have converging verticals because of the ravening horde of tourists. Some of the good exposure I can attribute to the near-miracle qualities of Kodak Portra 800 - it has impressive latitude and flexibility - and would you have ever guessed from looking at the grain that it was an 800 speed film? I took a guess at how to expose it - I figured the windows would average out to a little above middle gray and so I took a spot-meter reading with my Sekonic 408 (which has a 5-degree spot meter) off a stained-glass segment and used that. I might have also done an incident reading near the altar to confirm my numbers, but I forget.
Here is a successful one on my 1962 Rolleicord Vb, 75mm f3.5 Xenar, 16-on kit, 2007 outdated Ilford XP2 Super 400 home-processed. I did a 20x16" print. Signal to Go! by pentaxpete, on Flickr
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.