my speed kit

back alley

back alley

IMAGES
Local time
4:24 PM
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
41,289
inspired by roland, i have put together a 'speed' kit...consisting of an rd1 body, along with a cv 28/1.9, a cv 40/1.4 and a zm 50/1.5...slowing things down a bit is my cv 15/4.5 ( i have to have a 15 in the kit)
i might add a cv 35/1.2 eventually, if funds and opportunity collide.

my slower kit will consist of an rd1s body, a cv 28/3.5 (or the cv 25), a canon 35/2.8 and a leica 50/2.8 m elmar (newer one). i also bought another cv 15 as a must have for any rd1 kit.
 
The Ultron and 40 Nokton are a great kit, Joe, I've used them together.

And the Color Skopar and Elmar-M, too !

Roland.
 
Good on you Joe. Fast is good. Good fast lenses that is. I also carry around the 28/f.19 and the 35/f1.4. The 35/f1.2 I´ve on (permanent?) loan is nice, but it´s so biiiig. Even makes the 28 seem small.
 
payasam said:
Joe, can't the lenses in your "speed kit" be used at smaller apertures?
Click to expand...

well, of course they can :p

but the slower lenses are smaller and lighter...plus i am in a lens buying and trying mood.
after years of a neurotic balancing act of how many lenses are too many lenses, i am finally free to just enjoy them all for thier unique qualities and characteristics.
 
Ezzie said:
Good on you Joe. Fast is good. Good fast lenses that is. I also carry around the 28/f.19 and the 35/f1.4. The 35/f1.2 I´ve on (permanent?) loan is nice, but it´s so biiiig. Even makes the 28 seem small.
Click to expand...

the 28 isn't really all the big.
my facination with the 35/1.2 comes from looking at images made by it coupled with all the positive chatter about it.
but i'm in no particular rush...
 
Do you have any problems with having both the 40mm and 50mm in your kit? It strikes me as weird having two lenses with such similar focal lengths. Or are they both in for their distinct characteristics?
 
shyoon said:
Do you have any problems with having both the 40mm and 50mm in your kit? It strikes me as weird having two lenses with such similar focal lengths. Or are they both in for their distinct characteristics?
Click to expand...

Indeed. I find that I don't even like having a 28 and a 35 together in the same kit. The spread is narrow enough that I just feel like I'm carrying extra weight for very little reason.
 
also mukul, i live alone (except for my dogs), don't drink or gamble, have no other hobbies and therefore my extra $$ is dedicated to my gear.

as to a 40 and a 50...i have always liked the 75 lens and on the rd1 my 50 is like a 75...the 40 was a complete surprise for me in that it translates to a 60mm lens and i seem to quite like that fov...who knew?
i have alwyas used both a 28 and a 35 together so that 'small' difference was not a factor for me. i also now have a 25 and a 28.
 
and just thinking that i could put a small/light kit together of just cv lenses...28/3.5 and cv 50/2.5...maybe i should pick up a cv 35/2.5 as well...a small, light and cheap kit for all those bad neighborhoods that i prowl...
 
Just buy an old Tele-Astranar 400/6.3 and put it on a Nikon F. Don;t have to load the camera- just the look will keep them away.

Sounds like a good kit. That 40/1.4 is tempting.

But F1.1 even more so...
 
Brian Sweeney said:
Just buy an old Tele-Astranar 400/6.3 and put it on a Nikon F. Don;t have to load the camera- just the look will keep them away.

Sounds like a good kit. That 40/1.4 is tempting.

But F1.1 even more so...
Click to expand...

yes, that 1.1 is looks sweet as well.
i have been tempted to sell the sonnar and get the nokton but have resisted so far.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom