critique my photos, be honest!

kuuan

loves old lenses
Local time
6:01 PM
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
3,613
the recent 'brutally honest critique' thread has drawn a lot of attention. It also has exposed issues, but the possibility to get 'honest' critique sure is intriguing. Not sure what to expect and if I shall like it, but I think the only way to find out is by trying 😉

now my trouble: which photo to choose? oh, now I found one! I know I know, if you say I should not go by flickr standards you do have a point, but I choose it because I admit it surprises me, as I just found out, that it has not received any fav nor comment:

5407872867_b47bde30c2_o.jpg
 
I think it is very difficult to make a photo of a group of people that is succesful. There will always be a few who stick out in the wrong way.
I like the expression of some of the faces but there's the unfortunate one "asleep" on the right side. Would also help if the guy who gives the demo has some of its face visible. I would also increase the contrast a bit, don't be afraid of that.
All in all, the subject is not super interesting i must say, for my western eyes it is not too simple to allow concentrate on one item (the action or the faces) but not exotic enough to make it more interesting; but the composition is quite good and you did well to bring out the most of this scene.

That's what i think of it.
 
I could make a number of critical observations about this photograph, such as:
- it is cropped too tight (guy's head cut off)
- it is not edited (printed) well, because the tonality is weak, contrast is low, and there is no differentiation between side elements and main focus ( differentiated dodging/burning)
- the main focal point of the picture is a fake Chanel t shirt of the lady
... and so on.
But this is all unimportant, because what counts, is what this picture means to you or to somebody who would be willing to buy it for money, like they did with Rhine II.
I suggest, that you regularly print your most interesting photos, stick the prints on a wall inside your apartment, and after a week or two force yourself to take down half of the "less good ones". After 10 years of doing this, you will become a good photographer.
 
In the spirit of honest critique I don't find this image especially interesting in any way. The composition is OK but nothing much is happening, aesthetically or in terms of content.
 
Sorry but I'm with the others here ... nothing at all stands out for me about this image. A boost in contrast and maybe add a bit of vignetting to give it a little more bite and interest?
 
Thank you all very much for your very appreciated critiques!
Already I learn a lot from them, I shall elaborate in a later reply. Can't do that now because I am typing in a small tablet. One thing that I learned that I should choose the photo which you kind people put the effort in to critique more carefully, one that I think more highly of myself. It was done very hurridly, I had written the post and suddenly had to go out and just took the one photo at hand. Please pardon me for that, now I feel I better try to cut this short.
And I shall put forward questions that I have about my photography in general which also have some relevance to the photo already shown.

In short, only after a few answers this thread has given me more than expected, and I shall try to better act up on it!

Thank you tons, cheers, andreas
 
@ Pherdinand:
thank you for your thoughts! You make it very easy to agree with all what you said.
about more contrast: more recently I have been daring it. I guess my PPing generally has improved a bit since I had 'done' this one a few years ago. Still my feelings are a bit mixed of the typical very high contrast and high what lightroom calls 'clarity' for some street pics seem to live on those mostly.

@ mfogiel:
agree with all the assessments regarding the photo.
I should take the advice of printing out my better liked photos to put them up in my apartment. Truth is that I hardly have printed out any of my photos and what you suggest is a bit challenging since I do not have any apartment or any place where I spend more time than about one month at a time. That should be enough though, and after a while I do come back to most of these places.
more on what this pic means to me later

@ nongfuspring:
I shall try to point out why personally I do find the pic at least somewhat interesting, but there is a big chance that it is just me. flickr response has told me that too

@ sparrow:
haha

@ Keith:
right! not sure about the vignetting, kind of like the face top left corner.
 
Why do I somewhat like the chosen pic, in spite of all it's weaknesses? Above all because it makes me smile. It makes me smile that in 2011, that's when I took this in Saigon, a simple thing like a vegetable cutter causes such a crowd of quite fascinated onlookers.

And there is a bit more to it which brings me to the general remarks about my photography, and for that I must tell a bit about myself:

I am a European who has spent more than 2 thirds of his adult life, or of the last 35 years, outside Europe, mostly in Asia, however I never lived in one place for a longer period of time. Most usually I have been returning to my native place for 3 months every year to make money and during the remaining 9 months have been rotating between various Asian countries. In each of them I have a continuous life but cut into slices of just a couple of month every a year.

That is I am far from being like a native in any of these countries but again have lived there long enough to have a different access and views than more short term travellers. I believe that this factors give me a unique view of the realities of the places I frequent. My photography should and will reflect that.

Travel or documentary photos sometimes give me big laughs for being viewed, sometimes sold in distorted ways. I give you an example: recently I came across a pics of a "Saddhu", a "holy man" in Kathmandu which was much celebrated. Comments like "one can see the spirituality" and such made their rounds. Now I know that this man must have been photographed beautifully 10.000 of times, not exaggerating. Even I had taken a pic or two of him, had uploaded one to my flickr that I had called "Postcard Saddhu". I know him since many years. Certainly very picturesque, sure enough he is featured on postcards that sell in Nepal. He dresses up and paints himself very colourfully indeed, than hangs out around the Pashupatinath temple in Kathmandu and poses for money. This is his job, he is a professional model. Spirituality, Saddhu? Nope..

What has all this to do with the photo shown?
Local photographers hardly take a pic of people being so much interested in a vegetable cutter, more short term tourist hardly would make it to that scene in a local kind of expo. Ok, this should not count to defend the photo which isn’t anything special, I fully agree, but at least it should explain why personally I do have some relation to it 😉

I shall post a photo that hopefully both reflects my position as photographers and is a better photograph soon, that is if I can find one 😉

Cheers, andreas
 
Individual threads like this looks to be a better and more organized way of asking and receiving honestly frank critiques. Kudos to the participants. This is what I had in mind all along.

🙂
 
Individual threads like this looks to be a better and more organized way of asking and receiving honestly frank critiques. Kudos to the participants. This is what I had in mind all along.

🙂


This works for me. 🙂
 
Too many points of interest too. The eye can never settle anywhere, just keeps scanning the item being cut and all the faces, again and again ...
 
Back
Top Bottom