dave lackey
Veteran
Certainly not indicative of 6400 in other photographers' posts. Go back to my link.
I don't know. I tried holding the x1 for a few shots in the shop when I was last there (Yesterday). It feels a bit to slippery for me. I agree Sort of like.. "digital Barnack" but, I felt worried to cradle it around the body and to the base of the lens when at the ready (extended). You know like you might hold a camera at the ready. Maybe with a thumbs up or half case with a grip. It can't just be me. The camera is a bit too cute in it's design. A grip on the shutter side would be most welcome.
Sean gives it a good review, saying its most direct competitor is the X100, while comparing it directly also with the Ricoh and new Pentax and putting it in context with NEX etc. The X2's AF is now like the X100, about 2x better than X1, while manual settings are faster and easier on the Leica. But he wishes it had the X100 viewfinder......Cannot afford a pay-site so haven't read Sean Reid's report. If anyone has his review summary, please let us know.😉
Sean gives it a good review, saying its most direct competitor is the X100, while comparing it directly also with the Ricoh and new Pentax and putting it in context with NEX etc. The X2's AF is now like the X100, about 2x better than X1, while manual settings are faster and easier on the Leica. But he wishes it had the X100 viewfinder...
Thank you, Doug...
...also aesthetically similar to the IIIF with an external VF.
speaking of aesthetics - One thing about the X2 I am not crazy about is the slightly raised shoe mount vs the flat on the X1. Wish they kept it the same, but I am sure there is a reason for it, most likely to accommodate the EVF.
Eric Kim with the X2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sX4Z7gZjrE