xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
It seems the only selling point is 'it's cheap!'
Ko.Fe did well to point out the copper lens mount. Copper?
Genuine Szechuan copper, the best kind.
It seems the only selling point is 'it's cheap!'
Ko.Fe did well to point out the copper lens mount. Copper?
Ko.Fe did well to point out the copper lens mount. Copper?
I doubt the mount is copper. Something must have gotten lost in translation there.
![]()
I'm more curious about the number of aperture blades... 7 or 12? Or did elements somehow get translated as "blades"?!
Somebody posted at L forum the link to the thread with more real live images and test shots taken with this lens:
http://forum.xitek.com/thread-1637876-1-1-1.html
Translate to English works. 🙂
Some shots with M-E and M240. IMO, at f2 it seems to be worst than my J-3 at f2 on M-E, while it is shimmed for FED-2...
The bokeh at f1.1 is not too bad in that sample shot.
If someone said the shot was taken with a 1950s speed Zunow lens of f1.1 at 5cm going for 5 grand $ or a rare LTM 5cm f1.1 Nikkor lens going for similar prices then most would be goo goo gaga over the image quality of the sample photo.
To be honest, I can't find anything wrong with bokeh of this lens. Maybe I'm not concentrated enough this time, but I noticed double jittering in Rokkor-M 40 bokeh right away, yet, many seems to like it. 🙂
I have the CV 50/1.1, which is a bargain lens for what you get.
Somebody posted at L forum the link to the thread with more real live images and test shots taken with this lens:
http://forum.xitek.com/thread-1637876-1-1-1.html
Translate to English works. 🙂
Some shots with M-E and M240. IMO, at f2 it seems to be worst than my J-3 at f2 on M-E, while it is shimmed for FED-2...