mh2000
Well-known
This is just a dumb lens test:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/49343796@N06/8300977160/sizes/k/in/photostream/
It shows that my new Sigma 30 is in family with Panasonic 14 and Olympus 17/2.8 with respect to sharpness.
Probably a little better than my 17 (despite the internet hate, I like the lens) and noticably better then the Panasonic 14 (despite the internet love, I'm not that impressed with the lens).
The Oly 45 is noticably better and look at that lack of CA!!! What do you expect? The Oly 40-150 really holds its own against the 45 though IMO.
Anyway, I'm not a lens tester, but I've had some negative experiences with Sigma lenses back when I shot Canon mount and wanted to do a quick and dirty test to make sure my new Sigma wasn't decentered or anything.
Out shooting the new 30, I have to say it's a spectacular mate for my Oly 17... for the way I shoot, I'm pretty confident that I'll be using the 17 + 30 for more than 90% of my photos.
Final plug: Buy the Sigma 30 while it's still $150! Freaking great bargain!!!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/49343796@N06/8300977160/sizes/k/in/photostream/
It shows that my new Sigma 30 is in family with Panasonic 14 and Olympus 17/2.8 with respect to sharpness.
Probably a little better than my 17 (despite the internet hate, I like the lens) and noticably better then the Panasonic 14 (despite the internet love, I'm not that impressed with the lens).
The Oly 45 is noticably better and look at that lack of CA!!! What do you expect? The Oly 40-150 really holds its own against the 45 though IMO.
Anyway, I'm not a lens tester, but I've had some negative experiences with Sigma lenses back when I shot Canon mount and wanted to do a quick and dirty test to make sure my new Sigma wasn't decentered or anything.
Out shooting the new 30, I have to say it's a spectacular mate for my Oly 17... for the way I shoot, I'm pretty confident that I'll be using the 17 + 30 for more than 90% of my photos.
Final plug: Buy the Sigma 30 while it's still $150! Freaking great bargain!!!