raid
Dad Photographer
It is a discussion that we encounter quite often here, and while it has little to do with artistic photography, it is part of being at RFF. Which lens or lenses do photographers prefer, considering the options available to them?
I am making my travel set each year lighter and smaller in size, but I try to keep some lenses or cameras involved even if it is at the cost of a "few extra ounces" ...
I love using 50mm lenses, but in a trip in which I want to minimize what I carry with me, I have been choosing 35mm lenses instead. In particular, the pre-asph Summilux with its 1.4 max aperture. I can use it as a wide angle lens (not very wide) and also as a normal lens (not tight). It is not super sharp when used wide open. but it provides lovely color images with the Leica M9.
I have also been using the Zeiss Planar 45/2 G. First, I used the G lens on a M 4/3 camera with an adapter (I got a 90mm view), and it was my travel tele lens, so to speak. The M9 has then the 35/1.4 for the normal look. Now, I have the Zeiss G lens in M mount, so I could use the lens also on the M9 as a normal lens. Do I really still need both lenses here? Maybe I need to replace the 35/1.4 Lux with a wider lens? I don't have any wider lenses that are excellent and that work well on the M9, though. Maybe the Rokkor 28/2.8M or the Kobalux 28/3.5? They are relatively slow, but the Planar 45/2 is fast enough to compensate.
It is "necessary" to take along the SWC for some MF photography.
As you see, I have such type of worries .....😀
I am making my travel set each year lighter and smaller in size, but I try to keep some lenses or cameras involved even if it is at the cost of a "few extra ounces" ...
I love using 50mm lenses, but in a trip in which I want to minimize what I carry with me, I have been choosing 35mm lenses instead. In particular, the pre-asph Summilux with its 1.4 max aperture. I can use it as a wide angle lens (not very wide) and also as a normal lens (not tight). It is not super sharp when used wide open. but it provides lovely color images with the Leica M9.
I have also been using the Zeiss Planar 45/2 G. First, I used the G lens on a M 4/3 camera with an adapter (I got a 90mm view), and it was my travel tele lens, so to speak. The M9 has then the 35/1.4 for the normal look. Now, I have the Zeiss G lens in M mount, so I could use the lens also on the M9 as a normal lens. Do I really still need both lenses here? Maybe I need to replace the 35/1.4 Lux with a wider lens? I don't have any wider lenses that are excellent and that work well on the M9, though. Maybe the Rokkor 28/2.8M or the Kobalux 28/3.5? They are relatively slow, but the Planar 45/2 is fast enough to compensate.
It is "necessary" to take along the SWC for some MF photography.
As you see, I have such type of worries .....😀